Parliamentarism in the System of Ensuring the National Security of Modern Russia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article is devoted to the definition of the role and importance of parliamentarism in ensuring the national security of modern Russia. The identified problems involve the consideration of such key points as the definition of possible directions of the parliament’s activities to ensure national security, including through the prism of the legitimacy of the parliamentary institution itself, as well as the analysis of the features of the formation and functioning of the parliamentary system, creating difficulties in the implementation of the global task of ensuring national security. On the basis of various approaches, factors that reduce the effectiveness of parliamentary activity are analyzed, key features of institutionalization and functioning that negatively affect the perception of parliamentary institutions by society are identified. A set of measures to increase the legitimacy of parliamentarism and the effectiveness of its institutions is proposed. Attention is also paid to the problems of political responsibility of the ruling elite, concrete measures and mechanisms are proposed to improve the institution of political responsibility, which ultimately should lead to the activation of the activities of parliamentary institutions to ensure national security.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alexander A. Kerimov

Ural Federal University named after B.N. Yeltsin

Email: kerimov68@mail.ru
Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor; Professor at the Department of Political Sciences Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation

Fatima A. Shebzukhova

Karachay-Circassian Republican Institute of Advanced Training of Educational Workers

Email: fatima1956@list.ru
Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor; Head at the Department of History, Social Studies and Political Science Cherkessk, Russian Federation

References

  1. Борисов В.В. Некоторые проблемы обеспечения национальной безопасности в Российской Федерации и зарубежный опыт обеспечения национальной безопасности // Вестник Челябинского государственного университета. Серия: Право. 2020. Т. 5. Вып. 2. С. 64-71. @@ Borisov V.V. Some problems of ensuring national security in the Russian Federation and foreign experience in ensuring national security. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. Series: Law. 2020. Vol. 5. Issue 2. Pp. 64-71.
  2. Карпышева Ю.О. К вопросу о соотношении понятий «система национальной безопасности» и «система обеспечения национальной безопасности» // Байкальский Вестник ДААД. 2018. № 1. С. 30-34. @@ Karpysheva Y.O. On the question of the correlation of the concepts of “national security system” and “national security system”. Baikal Bulletin of DAAD. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 30-34.
  3. Керимов А.А. Парламентаризм в современной России: особенности и проблемы реализации // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 48. С. 145-153. @@ Kerimov A.A. Parliamentarism in modern Russia: Features and problems of implementation. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science. 2019. No. 48. Pp. 145-153.
  4. Ковалев А.А. Парламент и общество: опыт взаимодействия и роль парламентаризма в сфере национальной безопасности // Вестник Поволжского института управления 2017. Т. 17. № 4. С. 4-11. @@ Kovalev A.A. Parliament and society: The experience of interaction and the role of parliamentarism in the field of national security. Bulletin of the Volga Institute of Management. 2017. Vol. 17. No. 4. Pp. 4-11.
  5. Кузнецов И.И. Конструирование демократии в современном мире: угрозы институциональных заимствований // Современные евразийские исследования. 2014. Т. 2. С. 30-41. @@ Kuznetsov I.I. Constructing democracy in the modern world: Threats of institutional borrowing. Modern Eurasian Studies. 2014. Vol. 2. Pp. 30-41.
  6. Левада-Центр: одобрение органов власти [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.levada.ru/indikatory/odobrenie- organov-vlasti/ @@ Levada Center: Government approval [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.levada.ru/indikatory/odobrenie-organov-vlasti/
  7. Малинова О.Ю. Теория представительства и политический символизм парламента в российском контексте // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2014. № 3 (27). С. 5-11. @@ Malinova O.Y. Theory of representation and political symbolism of parliament in the Russian context. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science. 2014. No. 3 (27). Pp. 5-11.
  8. Назаров В.П., Афиногенов Д.А. Проблемы развития общей теории национальной безопасности в контексте корректировки стратегии национальной безопасности Российской Федерации // Власть. 2020. Т. 28. № 1. С. 9-19. @@ Nazarov V.P., Afinogenov D.A. Problems of the development of the general theory of national security in the context of the adjustment of the national security strategy of the Russian Federation. Power. 2020. Vol. 28. No. 1. Pp. 9-19.
  9. Серебряников В.В. Безопасность России и ее геополитический аспект: методологические вопросы // Проблемы глобальной безопасности: Тезисы докладов на семинаре в рамках научно-исследовательской программы (ноябрь 1994 - февраль 1995 гг.). М.: РАН ИНИОН, 1995. С. 378-383. @@ Serebryanikov V. Security of Russia and its geopolitical aspects: Methodological issues of global security. Abstracts of the seminar in the framework of the research program (November 1994 - February 1995). Moscow: INION RAN, 1995. Pp. 378-383.
  10. Тимофеева Л.Н. Конфликтогенность взаимоотношений власти и оппозиции в условиях политической модернизации: риски и возможности их гармонизации // Конфликтология. 2014. № 4. С. 82-93. @@ Timofeev L.N. Conflicts of relations between the authorities and the opposition in terms of political modernization: Risks and opportunities of their harmonization. Conflict. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 82-93.
  11. Феофилова Т.Ю., Радыгин Е.В., Литвиненко А.Н. Экономическая безопасность - стратегический национальный приоритет РФ: анализ новой стратегии национальной безопасности РФ // Вестник Алтайской академии экономики и права. 2021. № 7-1. С. 83-88. @@ Feofilova T.Y., Radygin E.V., Litvinenko A.N. Economic security - the strategic national priority of the Russian Federation: analysis of the new national security strategy of the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law. 2021. No. 7-1. Pp. 83-88.
  12. Шашкова Я.Ю. Особенности транзита 90-х гг. ХХ в. как детерминанта современного российского политического режима // Известия Алтайского государственного университета. 2009. № 4-4. С. 311-316. @@ Shashkova Y.Y. Features of transit of the 90s of the XX century. as a determinant of the modern Russian political regime. News of the Altai State University. 2009. No. 4-4. Pp. 311-316.
  13. Fiott D. On the value of parliamentary diplomacy // Madariaga Paper. 2011. Vol. 4. No. 7. Pр. 1-6.
  14. Lippman W. US Foreign Policy: Shield of the republic. Boston: Little, Brown and Co. XIV, 1943. 177 p.
  15. Wolfers A. Discord and collaboration: Essays on international politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. XVII, 1962. 283 p.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies