The Subjective Side of the Offence of Causing Harm to Health by Artificial Intelligence


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Objective of the research. The article is devoted to research of problems of establishment of subjective aspect of corpus delicti of a crime in case of causing harm to health by the artificial intelligence. Relevance of the theme is due to the lack of regulatory framework on the possibility of bringing the artificial intelligence to justice, including criminal, in connection with the increasingly frequent cases of causing harm to health, property by artificial intelligence, namely, systems that use artificial intelligence. The relevance of the research determined its objective, which is to determine the potential possibility of recognition of artificial intelligence as a subject of criminal legal relations in the current criminal law. In the process of research the authors provide a reasoned justification of the lack of signs of the subjective side in case of causing harm to health by artificial intelligence as a result of its ability to self-learning. The paper also presents the authors’ substantiation of the ways of compensation for the health damage caused by the artificial intelligence. Conclusions. According to the results of the study, the authors have concluded that under the current criminal law to prosecute the artificial intelligence is impossible due to the lack of subjective features of a crime. As a part of the solution of the artificial intelligence responsibility for the crime the authors conclude on the need to develop special legislation that will define the status of the artificial intelligence in civil, criminal and other spheres, the order of damages and possible consequences for the artificial intelligence.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Svetlana V. Petrikova

National Research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogarev

Email: petrikova_sveta@mail.ru
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor; Head at the Department of Criminal Law, Criminology and Criminology Saransk, Russian Federation

Alina A. Lavrushkina

National Research Mordovia State University named after N.P. Ogarev

Email: lawr88alina@yandex.ru
the 3rd year student at the Law Faculty Saransk, Russian Federation

References

  1. Averinskaya S.A. Creation of artificial intelligence for the purpose of malicious use in the criminal law of the Russian Federation. Zakon i pravo. 2019. No. 2. Pp. 94-96. (In Rus.)
  2. Apostolova N.N. Responsibility for harm caused by artificial intelligence. North Caucasian Legal Bulletin. 2021. No. 1. Pp. 112-119. (In Rus.)
  3. Bugakov I.A., Tsarkov A.N. On cognitive modeling, artificial intelligence and the psyche of robots. News of the Institute of Engineering Physics. 2018. Pp. 101-106. (In Rus.)
  4. Buz S.I. Cybercrimes: Concept, essence and general characteristics. Yurist-Pravoved. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 78-82. (In Rus.)
  5. Bychkov V.V. Artificial intelligence: State policy and vectors of application. Crime Investigation: Problems and Solutions. 2020. No. 4. Pp. 45-50. (In Rus.)
  6. Vasiliev A., Shpopper D., Mataeva M. The term “artificial intelligence” in Russian law: Doctrinal analysis. Yurisling-vistika. 2018. No. 7-8. P. 39. (In Rus.)
  7. Kibalnik A.G. Artificial intelligence: Questions of criminal law doctrine awaiting answers. Legal Science and Practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 173-178. (In Rus.)
  8. Lapunin M.M. Circumstances precluding criminality of the act, and scientific and technical progress. Bulletin of the Academy of the General Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. 2017. No. 6. Pp. 81-87. (In Rus.)
  9. Matkova A.A. Why can artificial intelligence replace tellers in banks in the next 3 years? Economy. Right. Management: Current Problems and Development Trends. 2017. No. 13. Pp. 10-18. (In Rus.)
  10. Morhat P.M. On the question of the correspondence of autonomous intelligent weapons systems to the principles of international humanitarian law. Bulletin of Military Law. 2018. No. 2. Pp. 58-65. (In Rus.)
  11. Mosechkin I.N. Artificial intelligence and criminal liability: Problems of formation of a new type of crime subject. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. 2019. No. 3. Pp. 461-476. (In Rus.)
  12. Ponkin A.V., Redkina A.I. Artificial intelligence from the point of view of law. Vestn. RUDN. Series: Legal Sciences. 2018. P. 94. (In Rus.)
  13. Sokova A.A. Artificial intelligence: Possibilities and necessity of its criminal law protection. Young ScientiSt. 2019. No. 16. Pp. 122-125. (In Rus.)
  14. Tyrranen V.A. Artificial intelligence and neural networks as a tool of modern cybercrime. Criminal Law: Development Strategy in the XXI Century: Materials of the XVI Intern. Scientific-Practical Conf. (24-25 Jan. 2019). Moscow: RG-Press, 2019. Pp. 135-140.
  15. Tsukanova E.Yu., Skopenko O.R. Legal aspects of liability for harm caused by a robot with artificial intelligence. Questions of Russian and International Law. 2018. No. 4A. Pp. 42-48. (In Rus.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies