Driving forces in global education policy scenarios


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Introduction. The issues of formation of modern ideas about the actor structure and driving forces of influence in the global educational policy framework are considered. Topic. The understanding of global educational policy is formed in several contexts: as a function of the state; as the activity of non-governmental organizations; as a compromise between multidirectional groups representing the interests of different countries and others. Methods. The application of the multipolarity methodology as the main position for global educational policy is justified. Results. The significance of globalization for the education development is clarified, and its main drivers (political, economic, cultural, technological, and financial) are highlighted. It is shown that establishing the structure of actors is not enough to form a holistic view of global educational policy without specifying in a single methodological structure the reasons for changes in the type and composition of actors and the value of innovations in the future educational agenda. The authors highlight the driving forces that influence global educational policy: scientific and technological progress, transformation of the world economic system, and development of communications; dynamism of foreign policy strategies, which makes it possible to implement the concept of“competition through cooperation”. It is proved that the set of possible actions of actors is realized through a sequence of scenarios (economic, institutional, and social scenarios) that lead to the formation of a globalizing scenario as an integral one. Discussion. The presented proposals to clarify the actor approach allow us to get away from the declarative nature and subjectivity of the justification of actors, combining the assessment of possible actions, policies and scenarios to obtain a methodologically significant identification of actors within the available set of knowledge in the chosen field-education.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

Ekaterina Antyukhova

Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)

Email: e.antyukhova@gmail.com
PhD (Pol. Sci.); senior lecturer, Comparative Politics Department Moscow, Russian Federation

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Verger A., Novelli M., Altinyelken H.K. Global education policy and international development: A revisited introduction. In: Verger A., Novelli M. and Altinyelken H.K. (eds.). Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and policies (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury, 2018. Рр. 1-34.
  2. Sassen S. Globalization and its discontents. New York: The New Press, 1998. 253 p.
  3. Mundy K. Globalization and educational change: New policy worlds. In: Bascia N., Cumming A., Datnow A., Leithwood K., Livingstone D. (eds.) International handbook of educational policy. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Vol. 13. Springer, Dordrecht, 2005. 1116 p.
  4. Dale R. Globalisation and education: Demonstrating a “common world educational culture” or locating a “globally structured educational agenda”? Educational Theory. 2000. No. 50 (4). Pp. 427-448.
  5. Hirst P., Thompson G. Globalisation in question. The international economy and the possibilities of governance. Cambridge, Polity Press, 1996. 631 p.
  6. Haass R. The age of non-polarity: What will follow US Dominance? Foreign Affairs. 2008. No. 87 (3). P. 44-56.
  7. Meyer J.W. The world polity and the authority of the nation-state. A. Bergesen (ed.); Studies of the Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press, 1980. Рр. 109-137.
  8. Meyer J., Boli J., Thomas G., Ramirez F. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology. 1997. No. 103 (1). Pр. 144-181.
  9. Дугин А.Г. Теория многополярного мира. Плюриверсум. М.: Академический проект, 2015. 532 c.
  10. Rosencrance R. Action and reaction in world politics: International systems in perspective. Praeger, 1963. 314 p.
  11. Ball S.J. Global education Inc: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. New York: Routledge, 2012. 184 p.
  12. Levi Faur D. Varieties of regulatory capitalism: Getting the most persistence of national variation. Governance. 2006. No. 19 (3). Pр. 367-382.
  13. Dale R., Robertson S. Beyond methodological “isms” in comparative education in an era of globalisation. In: Handbook on comparative education. F. Kazamias, R. Cowan (eds.). Netherlands: Springer, 2007. Pр. 19-32.
  14. Макажанова Ж.М. Поликультурность в современном образовании, или чем отличается поликультурность от мультикультурализма // Непрерывное образование: XXI век. 2018. № 3 (23). C. 106-113.
  15. Чучин-Русов А.Е. Культурный плюрализм // Общественные науки и современность. 1995. № 4. URL: http://ecsocman. hse.ru/data/489/736/1216/019_Chuchin-Rusov_KULTURA.pdf.
  16. Палаткина Г.В. Мульти-культурное образование в полиэтническом пространствe. Астрахань: Изд-во Астраханского гос. пед. ун-та, 2001. 196 c.
  17. Байер Ю.П. Акторный подход к исследованию глобальной образовательной политики // Управленческое консультирование. 2019. № 3. С. 72-78. doi: 10.22394/1726-1139- 2019-3-72-78.
  18. Цыганков П.А. Акторы и факторы в международных отношениях и мировой политике / Приватизация мировой политики: локальные действия - глобальные результаты / под ред. М.М. Лебедевой. М.: ЗАО Голдон-Би, 2013. C. 30-53.
  19. Лебедева М.М. Мировая политика. М.: Аспект Пресс, 2016. 351 c.
  20. Калюжная Д.Е. Современные акторы мировой политики и переход к устойчивому развитию // Социодинамика. 2013. № 5. С. 45-87. doi: 10.7256/2306-0158.2013.5.664.
  21. Risse Th. Transnational actors and world politics / Handbook of international relations / Ed. by W. Carsnaes, Th. Risse, B.A. Simmons. London: Sage, 2002. Pр. 251-286.
  22. Fumasoli Т., Stensaker В., Vukasovic М. Tackling the multi-actor and multi-level complexity of European governance of knowledge: Transnational actors in focus. European Educational Research Journal. 2018. Vol. 17. No. 3. Pр. 325-334. doi: 10.1177/1474904117742763.
  23. Бек У. Жизнь в обществе глобального риска - как с этим справиться: космополитический поворот: лекция / пер. В. Малахова. URL: https://www.gorby.ru/userfiles/lekciya_ulrih_beka.pdf
  24. Piirainen T. Towards a new social order in Russia: Transforming structures in everyday life. University of Helsinki, 1997. 254 p.
  25. Ростоу У. Стадии экономического роста. Нью-Йорк: Изд- во Фредерика А Прегер, 1961. 242 с.
  26. Габриелян А.М. Мировые тренды и вызовы системе высшего образования: матрица эффективной политики реформ университета // Мировая политика. 2017. № 1. С. 37-46. doi: 10.7256/2409-8671.2017.1.22049.
  27. Измайлова М.А. Современное российское образование через призму глобальной образовательной политики // Гуманитарные науки. Вестник Финансового университета. 2018. № 8 (4). С. 36-43. doi: 10.26794/2226-7867-2018-8-4-36-43.
  28. Global education futures. Educational ecosystems for societal transformation. 26.04.2018. URL: http://www.globaledufutures.org/images/people/GEF_april26-min.pdf

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML


Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>