Some characteristics of contemporary political and legal discourse of ethnic and national conflicts in Russia


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The issue of ethnic relations and the conflicts generated by them is acutely relevant. Many branches and directions of modern science study it. Political science and jurisprudence are in the foreground of the modern study of ethno-national conflictology. Over a long period of research, they have developed several influential approaches that have become widespread. The growing complexity of the surrounding political and legal reality, the escalation of conflict in society, including ethno-national, require the search and application of new research paradigms. One of these is the analysis of political and legal discourse, which consists in studying the ways of how legal meanings, ideas, opinions and preferences, which are carried by legislators, are technically and meaningfully embodied in the texts of normative acts, subsequently forming a specific political and legal reality. Analyzing the domestic ethno-conflictological political and legal discourse, the author concludes that in the era of the Russian Empire, the legalization of ethno-national relations had little attention from legislators, the documents adopted in the 19th century carried widespread ideas of the legislative theory and existed unchanged until 1917. The basic paradigm of the Soviet political and legal regulation of ethno-national relations was the ideological dogmas of the theorists of Marxism-Leninism, within which, in Soviet society, such a phenomenon as an ethno-national conflict was denied, but, in fact, existed. At the present stage, after the acute events of the second half of the 1980s - 1990s, a serious system of political and legal regulation of ethno-national relations was developed. It bore fruit. Today, the domestic political and legal regulation of ethno-national relations has the character of a developing system designed to adequately respond to changes. The article can be used to improve the state social and legal policy of the Russian Federation. Also, the materials presented can provide the interest of students, graduate students, teachers, researchers and other people who are interested in the current social, political and legal development of Russia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Andrey N. Kuriukin

Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Email: kuriukin@inbox.ru
Cand. Sci. (Polit.); senior researcher of Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Административные правонарушения. URL: http://stat. xn----7sbqk8achja.xn--p1ai/stats/adm/t/31/s/80 (дата обращения: 01.07.2020).
  2. Вдовин А. Подлинная история русских. XX век. М.: Алгоритм, 2010.
  3. Горбунов А.Н. Борьба с преступлениями экстремистской направленности // Власть. 2016. № 1. С. 72-73.
  4. Количество преступлений экстремистской направленности, уголовные дела о которых направлены в суд. URL: http://crimestat.ru/offenses_rate (дата обращения: 30.06.2020).
  5. Конституция (Основной Закон) Союза Советских Социалистических Республик // Ведомости Верховного Совета СССР. 1977. № 41. Ст. 617
  6. Кукушкин Ю.С., Чистяков О.И. Очерк истории Советской Конституции. М., Политиздат, 1987.
  7. Ленин В.И. О национальном вопросе и национальной политике. М.: Госполитиздат. 1989.
  8. Мирзоян С.Э. Межнациональные конфликты: характеристика, причины // Юридические науки. 2016. № 9. С. 8.
  9. Мощелков Е. Национально-государственная проблема в переходном процессе: опыт России (1917-1922) // Кыргызская государственность в XX веке (документы, история, комментарии). Бишкек: НАН РК, 2003.
  10. Письмо И.В. Сталина В.И. Ленину об определении порядка отношений центра с республиками. 22 сентября 1922 года // ЦК РКП(б)-ВКП(б) и национальный вопрос. Кн. 1. 1918-1933. М.: Российская политическая энциклопедлия (РОССПЕН). 2005. С. 78-79.
  11. РГАНИ. Ф. 89. Оп. 6. Д. 29. Л. 1-3.
  12. Состояние преступности - январь-декабрь 2015 года. URL: https://xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/reports/item/7087734/ (дата обращения: 30.06.2020).
  13. Состояние преступности - январь-декабрь 2016 года. URL: https://xn--b1aew.xn--p1ai/upload/site1/document_news/009/338/947/sb_1612.pdf (дата обращения: 30.06.2020).
  14. Справка КГБ СССР о массовых беспорядках в стране с 1957 г. Особая папка Политбюро. АПРФ. Ф. 45. Оп. 1. Д. 1120. Л. 48-81.
  15. Hofmeister U. Kolonialmacht Sowjetunion. Ein Rückblick auf den Fall Uzbekistan. Berlin. Osteuropa, 2006. Р. 3.
  16. Huttenbach H. Introduction: Towards a unitary Soviet State: Managing a multinational society, 1917-1985. In: Soviet Naionality Policies. Ruling Ethnic Groups in the USSR. London-NY: Mansell Publishing Limited, 1990. Р. 5.
  17. Martin T. The Soviet affirmative action empire. Nations and nationalism in Soviet Union, 1923-1939. NY-London: Cornell Un. Press, 2001. 455 p.
  18. Roy O. The new Central Asia. The creations of nations. London-NY: Un. Press. 2000.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies