Some comparative aspects of the compositions of inducement to commit suicide or of facilitating suicide and inducement

Purpose of research. The activation of state bodies to improve measures to counter suicide among minors in the Russian Federation led to the adoption on June 7, 2017 of Federal Law No. 120-FZ, which provides for the introduction of criminal liability for inducement to commit suicide or assistance in committing suicide. According to the legislator, criminal punishment for driving to suicide is not enough, due to the limited list of methods of committing, listed in the corresponding disposition, in connection with which it was necessary to include in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation a norm designed to settle legal relations arising, inter alia, between persons - administrators of death groups «On the Internet and juvenile adolescents showing suicidal tendencies. In connection with the inclusion of new structures, it seems interesting, first of all, to analyze the correlation of a number of features of the indicated corpus delicti. Results. A brief analysis of the problem in the title of the article allows us to assert: 1. In the conditions of the existence of the gravamen of a charge constituting forcing to suicide, the expediency of identifying the declinations and facilitating the commission of suicide is subject to significant criticism in the scientific community. Researchers, first of all, note the absence of significant grounds for this and point to the existence of a sufficient regulatory framework governing such legal relations. The novellas were not sufficiently considered and worked out in terms of legal technique and the potential for the effectiveness of law enforcement. It is important that historically, these gravamens existed together, were considered as stages of a single malicious criminal act within the framework of one rule. 2. The lack of a uniform understanding of related crimes from the point of view of their categorization and differentiation according to the degree of public danger does not allow talking about an integral system of human rights measures, as well as objectively assessing the criminal law value of related structures. 3. Crimes under Art. 110.1 of the Criminal Code and Art. 110 of the Criminal Code are differentiated according to the following positions, namely: objective side in terms of establishing exceptional methods of committing each criminal act; constructions of the objective side as a whole, where the presence or absence of socially dangerous consequences is of fundamental importance; the degree of public danger of each specific gravamen of a charge; signs of the subjective side, which emphasizes the strict definition of the form of guilt as in crimes committed with direct intent, provided for in Art. 110.1 CC.

suicide, bringing, declining, assisting