Corporate Culture and Legal (Labor) Custom: The Relationship of Concepts
- Authors: Vengerovsky E.L.1, Vasiliev T.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
- Issue: Vol 20, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 109-115
- Section: Private Law (Civil) Sciences
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2541-8025/article/view/635679
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2541-8025-2024-20-3-109-115
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XTYXVF
- ID: 635679
Cite item
Abstract
A task. Corporate culture is an integral part of the existence of any organization. The main issue of the existence of corporate culture from the point of view of legal science is its legal regulation. And if everything is quite clear from the point of view of official sources of its broadcasting, then the corporate culture is regulated by local regulations. Corporate culture in terms of unwritten rules of conduct in an organization is an open question. Model. Legal regulation of corporate culture and general theoretical foundations for the formation of its legal understanding. The article uses a number of scientific research methods, in particular: the method of analysis, comparative legal, formal logical methods and the method of comparative jurisprudence. This will allow us not only to solve modern problems in the field of the correlation of the legal foundations of regulation of civil law relations and corporate culture. The scientific novelty of the research consists in an attempt to understand the relationship between the concepts of corporate culture and legal custom. Also, for the purposes of this work, the concept of «labor custom» is formulated, as well as in the ratio of definitions of corporate culture and legal custom at the theoretical level, supporting the study with arguments from practice. Conclusion. According to the results of the study, it was concluded that corporate culture is essentially a narrower concept than legal (labor) custom, and issues not regulated by civil legislation are part of corporate culture.
Keywords
Full Text

About the authors
Evgeny L. Vengerovsky
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Author for correspondence.
Email: elv-2312@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3622-1756
SPIN-code: 2585-9812
Cand. Sci. (Law), Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law Disciplines of the Higher School of Law
Russian Federation, MoscowTimofey V. Vasiliev
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Email: tim.v4siliev@yandex.ru
SPIN-code: 3658-6114
Member of the Association of Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (RBEN), lawyer, expert in compliance control
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Zhukov V. N. Philosophy of law : textbook. M. : The world of philosophy ; Algorithm, 2019. 559 p.
- Kryzhan V.A. Legal custom and judicial practice as sources of labor law: abstract of the thesis ... PhD. Perm, 2006. pp. 20-21.
- Mugalova Zhamelya Alimbaevna Corporate culture of a modern organization in a changing society // Bulletin of the MIEP. 2015. №3 (20).
- E. N. Yarmonova Legal custom as a source of law // International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2019. №2-2.
- Vasilenko, S.V. Corporate culture as a tool for effective personnel management. − M.: Dashkov and K, 2013.
- Kozhevnikova T.I. / Corporate culture—Moscow : Eksmo, 2023. —240 p.
- Managing the transformation of corporate culture of an organization: the transformation of elements of informal corporate culture into the structure of formal corporate culture Bogdanova V.V., Bazhin A.S., Svetailo R.V. Monograph / Saarbrucken, 2015.
- Pokrovskaya E.S. The influence of corporate culture on the process of adaptation of employees of the organization // Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2017. No. 12-2 (45). pp. 37–39.
- Grishanin N.V., Minevich Ya.V., Sokolova T.D., Tovstiy V.V. Modern realities of corporate culture formation in the youth environment: interaction of law and ideology // Law enforcement. 2023. Vol. 7. No. 1. pp. 15–24.
- Bandurin A.P. Corporate culture and corporate law in self-regulation and organization of the social regulation system of Russia // Society and Law. 2007. No. 2 (16). pp. 6–12.
Supplementary files
