Main improvement organizations of federal specialized (oncologic) institute as a unit of health system

Recently economic analysis of health care is demanded and actual due to becoming more and more urgent need for restructuring and a choice of priorities for this boundary section of medicine. In the article are considered strong and weaknesses of health system models, including in option of a so-called transitional economy on the example of federal N. N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology. Now the N. N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology can call establishment of national health system with state regulation of programs of general obligatory medical insurance. In this model of health care the state obliges employers and citizens to deduct part of the income on the health insurance, and producers of medical services to provide the population with medical care, including with mediation of insurance companies within obligatory medical insurance. Introduction of this model allowed to provide citizens with full medical care at the expressed reduction of expenses (to 8-12 % of gross domestic product). In the majority of medical institutions medical care is “free”, therefore, to maintain market balance at increase in demand for service, "waiting lists" are entered, patients with “priority” diseases are exposed to treatment, often there are complaints to the unfriendly attitude towards patients. The ideal health system has to provide medical services in unlimited volume without insurance premiums, deductions or individual share at a full freedom of choice of the doctor. Common problem for all systems, mentioning in no small measure functioning of oncologic establishments, is uncertainty of a state role and involvement of each of participants (the state, insurance companies, suppliers of medical services) in realization of various potential functions and problems of health care.

N. N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, health care, health system models, health care economy