Linguistic Disfluency in Story-telling: Evidence from Lithuanianand Russian-speaking Preschoolers


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Speech disfluency can be distinguished as being either stuttering or linguistic disfluency; the latter can be divided into categories such as hesitations, fillers, repetitions, revisions, and connectors. Significance of linguistic disfluencies in the flow of conversation has been particularly emphasized at the very beginning of studies in conversational analysis; however, linguistic disfluency in children speech still has not been widely investigated. The paper deals with the production of mazes in story-telling. Our analysis was based on experimental data of two (Lithuanian- and Russian-speaking) groups of typically-developing monolingual children from middle-class families, attending state kindergartens. During the experiment, the children were asked to tell a story according to the picture sequence. After transcription of video-/audio-recorded stories, production of mazes was measured automatically by using CLAN tools. The study highlighted the main tendencies of linguistic disfluency in the narratives of Lithuanian- and Russian-speaking TD preschoolers, such as dominance of hesitations (especially, silent (unfilled) pauses) among all the mazes and prevalence of lexical reformulations among all the revisions. Only a few but significant differences were obtained between the groups: first, only in the Russian-speaking group hesitations correlated with revisions; second, in the Russian-speaking group, repetitions correlated with fillers, while in the Lithuanian-speaking group a correlation between silent (unfilled) pauses and repetitions was identified. The differences observed between the groups might lead to raising a question about cross-linguistic and cross-cultural universalities and differences from the perspective of linguistic disfluency in narrative speech.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ingrida Balčiūnienė

Vytautas Magnus University

Email: i.balciuniene@hmf.vdu.lt
PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Lithuanian Language. Vytautas Magnus University.

Aleksandr N Kornev

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of Health Ministry of Russia

Email: k1949@yandex.ru
Dr Sci, Professor, Department of General and Applied Psychology at the Rate of Biomedical Sciences. St. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University.

References

  1. Ахутина Т. В. Порождение речи. Нейролингвистический анализ синтаксиса. - М., 1989. [Ahutina TV. Speach damage. Neurolinguistical analysis of syntaxes. Moscow; 1989. (In Russ).]
  2. Bock K, Levelt WJM. Language production. Grammatical encoding. In: Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Ed. M. A. Gernsbacher. New York: Academic Press; 1994: 741-79.
  3. Corley M, Stewart OW. Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass. 2008;2(4):589-602.
  4. Fiestas CE, Bedore LM, Pe-a ED, Nagy VJ. Use of mazes in the narrative language samples of bilingual and monolingual 4-to 7-year old children. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism. Ed by J. Cohen, K. T. McAlister, K. Rolstad, J. MacSwan. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press; 2005:730-40.
  5. Fromkin V. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language. 1971;47(1):27-52.
  6. Gagarina N, Klop D, Kunnari S, et al. MAIN: Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives. Berlin: ZAS; 2012.
  7. Garrett M F. The limits of accommodation. In: Errors in Linguistic Performance. Ed by V. Fromkin. New York: Academic; 1980:263-71.
  8. Jefferson G. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Conversational Analysis: Studies from the First Generation. Ed by G. H. Lerner. John Benjamins; 2004:13-31. doi: 10.1075/pbns.125.02jef
  9. Loban W. Language Development: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. NCTE Committee on Research Report No. 18. Urbana, Ill.: National Council of Teachers of English; 1976.
  10. MacWhinney B. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk. Electronic Edition. Available at: http://childes.psy.cmu.edu/manuals/CLAN.pdf (accessed 10.11.2015).
  11. McCabe A. Preface: Structure as a way of understanding. In: Developing Narrative Structure. Ed by A. McCabe, C. Peterson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1991: ix-vxii.
  12. Peterson C, McCabe A. Linking children's connective use and narrative macrostructure. In: Developing Narrative Structure. Ed by A. McCabe, C. Peterson. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1991:29-53.
  13. Redmond SN. Conversational profiles of children with ADHD, SLI and typical development. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics. 2004;18(2):107-125.
  14. Shapiro D. A. Stuttering Intervention: A Collaborative Journey to Fluency Freedom. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1999.
  15. Sieff S., Hooyman B. Language-based disfluency: A child case study. Miami, FL: Hearing Association Annual Convention; 2006.
  16. Watanabe M, Rose RL. Pausology and hesitation phenomena in second language acquisition. In: The Routledge Encyclopedia of Second Language Acquisition. Ed by P. Robinson. New York/London: Routledge; 2012:480-483.
  17. Wijnen F. Fluency as a marker of expressive language development skill in children. In: The International Association for the Study of Child Language. Montreal; 2011.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2016 Balčiūnienė I., Kornev A.N.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 69634 от 15.03.2021 г.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies