Pathophysiological principles for evaluating hemodynamic
- Authors: Marchenko S.P.1, Khubulava G.G.1, Naumov A.B.1, Seliverstova A.A.1, Cipurdeeva N.D.2, Suvorov V.V.1, Nevmergitskaiy O.V.1, Alexandrovich U.S.1, Kulemin E.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
- Military Medical Academy named after S. M. Kirov
- Issue: Vol 5, No 4 (2014)
- Pages: 110-117
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/pediatr/article/view/1172
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PED54110-117
- ID: 1172
Cite item
Abstract
Full Text
![Restricted Access](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
About the authors
Sergey Pavlovich Marchenko
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: sergeimarchenkospb@gmail.com
MD, PhD, Dr Med Sci, Professor, Department of Сardiac Surgery
Gennadiy Grigorevich Khubulava
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: khubulava@clubcvs.ru
MD, PhD, Dr Med Sci, Professor, Department of Сardiac Surgery
Alexey Borisovich Naumov
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: naumov99@gmail.com
MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology and Resuscitation
Anastasia Alexeevna Seliverstova
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: alisa-0072006@yandex.ru
Assistant Professor, Department of Сardiac Surgery
Natalia Dmitrievna Cipurdeeva
Military Medical Academy named after S. M. Kirov
Email: cipurdeeva@gmail.com
Student
Vitaliy Vladimirovich Suvorov
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: vitalikkrak@gmail.com
Assistent Professor, Department of Сardiac Surgery
Oksana Vladimirovna Nevmergitskaiy
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: ovnevmer@gmail.com
MD, PhD, Chiev of Neonatology of Pediatric
Uriy Stanislavovich Alexandrovich
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: jalex1963@mail.ru
MD, PhD, Dr Med Sci, Professor, Head, Department of Anesthe-siology, Intensive Care and Emergency Pediatrics Postgraduate Education
Evginiy Sergeevich Kulemin
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: kulemin.es@gmail.com
Intern, Department of Сardiac Surgery
References
- Barbier C., Loubieres Y., Schmit C., et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intens. Care. Med. 2004; 30: 1740-46.
- Bayliss W. M., Starling E. H. Observations on venous pressures and their relationship to capillary pressures. J. Physiol. 1894; 16: 159-318.
- Brengelmann G. L. Counterpoint: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is not correct. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006; 101: 1525-26.
- Buhre W., Weyland A., Schorn B., et al. Changes in central venous pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure do not indicate changes in right and left heart volume in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur. J. Anaesthiol. 1999; 16: 11-17.
- Calvin J. E., Driedger A. A., Sibbald W. J. The hemodynamic effect of rapid fluid infusion in critically ill patients. Surgery. 1981; 90: 61-76.
- Calvin J. E., Driedger A. A., Sibbald W. J. Does the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure predict left ventricular preload in critically ill patients? Crit. Care. Med. 1981; 9: 437-43.
- Cecconi M., Parsons A. K., Rhodes A. What is a fluid challenge? Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2011; 17: 290-95.
- Della Rocca G., Costa G. M., Coccia C., Pompei L., Di Marco P., Pietropaoli P. Preload index: pulmonary artery occlusion pressure versus intrathoracic blood volume monitoring during lung transplantation. Anesth. Analg. 2002; 95: 835-43.
- Den Hartog E. A., Versprille A., Jansen J. R. Systemic filling pressure in intact circulation determined on basis of aortic vs. central venous pressure relationships. Am. J. Physiol. 1994; 267: 2255-58.
- Feissel M., Michard F., Mangin I., Ruyer O., Faller J. P., Teboul J. L. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest. 2001; 119: 867-73.
- Guyton A. C. Basic Human Physiology: Normal Function and Mechanisms of Disease. Saunders, Philadelphia; 1971.
- Guyton A. C. Determination of cardiac output by equating venous return curves with cardiac response curves. Physiol. Rev. 1955; 35: 123-29.
- Guyton A. C., Lindsey A. W., Kaufmann B. N. Effect of mean circulatory filling pressure and other peripheral circulatory factors on cardiac output. Am. J. Physiol. 1955; 180: 463-8.
- Hiesmayr M., Jansen J. R., Versprille A. Effects of endotoxin infusion on mean systemic filling pressure and flow resistance to venous return. Pflugers. Arch. 1996; 431: 741-47.
- Hoeft A., Schorn B., Weyland A., et al. Bedside assessment of intravascular volume status in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery. Anesthesiol. 1994; 81: 76-86.
- Jansen R., Maas J. J., Pinsky M. R. Bedside assessment of mean systemic filling pressure. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2010; 16: 231-36.
- Jardin F., Valtier B., Beauchet A., Dubourg O., Bourdarias J. P. Invasive monitoring combined with two-dimensional echocardiographic study in septic shock. Intens. Care. Med. 1994; 20: 550-54.
- Kumar A., Anel R., Bunnell E., et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit. Care. Med. 2004; 32: 691-99.
- Lichtwarck-Aschoff M., Zeravik J., Pfeiffer U. J. Intrathoracic blood volume accurately reflects circulatory volume status in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation. Intens. Care. Med. 1992; 18: 142-47.
- Maas J. J., Geerts B. F., Van den Berg P. C., Pinsky M. R., Jansen J. R. Assessment of venous return curve and mean systemic filling pressure in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Crit. Care. Med. 2009; 37: 912-18.
- Magder S. Point: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006; 101: 1523-25.
- Marik P. E., Baram M., Vahid В. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008; 134: 172-78.
- Marik P. E., Cavallazzi R., Vasu T., Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit. Care. Med. 2009; 37: 2642-47.
- Michard F., Alaya S., Zarka V., Bahloul M., Richard C., Teboul J. L. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2003; 124: 1900-08.
- Michard F., Teboul J. L. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002; 121: 2000-08.
- Osman D., Ridel C., Ray P., et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit. Care. Med. 2007; 35: 64-8.
- Parkin W. G., Wright C. A. Three dimensional closed loop control of the human circulation. Int. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1991; 8: 35-42.
- Parkin W. G., Wright C. A., Bellomo R., Boyce N. Use of a mean systemic filling pressure analogue during the closed-loop control of fluid replacement in continuous hemodiafiltration. Crit. Care. 1994; 9: 124-33.
- Parkin W. G., Leaning M. S. Therapeutic control of the circulation. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 2008; 22: 391-400.
- Patterson S. W., Piper H., Starling E. H. The regulation of the heart beat. J Physiol. 1914; 48: 465-513.
- Patterson S. W., Starling E. H. On the mechanical factors which determine the output of the ventricles. J. Physiol. 1914; 48: 357-79.
- Pellegrino V. A., Mudaliar Y., Gopalakrishnan M., et al. Computer based haemodynamic guidance system is effective and safe in management of postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Anaesth. Intens. Care. 2011; 39: 191-201.
- Pinsky M. R. Rationale for cardiovascular monitoring. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care. 2009; 9: 222-24.
- Reuter D. A., Felbinger T. W., Moerstedt K., et al. Intrathoracic blood volume index measured by thermodilution for preload monitoring after cardiac surgery. J. Cardiothorac. Vase. Anesth. 2002; 16: 191-95.
- Sakka S. G., Reinhart K., Meier-Hellmann A. Comparison of pulmonary artery and arterial thermodilution cardiac output in critically ill patients. Intens. Care. Med. 1999; 25: 843-46.
- Schipke J. D., Heusch G., Sanii A. P., Gams E., Winter J. Static filling pressure in patients during induced ventricular fibrillation. Am. J. Physiol. H. Circ. Physiol. 2003; 285: 2510-15.
- Thys D. M., Hillel Z., Goldman M. E., Mindich B. P., Kaplan J. A. A comparison of hemodynamic indices derived by invasive monitoring and two-dimensional echocardiography. Anesthesiol. 1987; 67: 630-34.
- Tousignant C. P., Walsh F., Mazer C. D. The use of transesophageal echocardiography for preload assessment in critically ill patients. Anesth. Analg. 2000; 90: 351-55.
- Versprille A., Jansen J. R. Mean systemic filling pressure as a characteristic pressure for venous return. Pflugers. Arch. 1985; 405: 226-33.
- Wiesenack C., Prasser C., Keyl C., Rodig G. Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution technique versus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter. J. Cardiothorac. Vase. Anesth. 2001; 15: 584-88.
Supplementary files
![](/img/style/loading.gif)