Modern methods for controlling and regulating impurities in pharmaceuticals
- Authors: Shulga N.A.1, Merkushova A.G.1, Gegechkori V.I.1, Chugaev D.V.1, Ramenskaya G.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
- Issue: Vol 73, No 6 (2024)
- Pages: 16-25
- Section: Pharmaceutical chemistry and pharmacognosy
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0367-3014/article/view/636989
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.29296/25419218-2024-06-03
- ID: 636989
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. The article is dedicated to modern principles of regulation and control of impurities in pharmaceutical products and active pharmaceutical substances, which is a crucial task for the pharmaceutical industry. The relevance of this research stems from the fact that the presence of impurities in pharmaceutical products can significantly affect their safety and efficacy, making the development of stringent control methods throughout the entire life cycle of a pharmaceutical product essential. Even small amounts of impurities can cause adverse effects or reduce the therapeutic value of drugs, as evidenced by historical examples.
The aim of the study is to analyze and systematize contemporary approaches to the detection and regulation of impurities in pharmaceutical products. The paper reviews current regulatory requirements, including guidelines from the The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and regulatory documents of the Eurasian Economic Community, as well as national pharmacopeias of the Russian Federation, the United States of America, and the European Union.
Conclusion. Additionally, the article emphasizes the need for harmonization of standards and practices for impurity control, which is especially relevant in the context of the globalization of the pharmaceutical market. Harmonization not only enhances the safety and efficacy of pharmaceutical products but also improves patients' quality of life by reducing the risk of adverse effects associated with impurities. The article also explores prospects for further improvement of regulatory acts and the implementation of advanced technologies aimed at enhancing standardization and quality control in the pharmaceutical industry.
Full Text

About the authors
Nikolay A. Shulga
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: shu.nik344@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8717-6161
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Chemistry named after A.P. Arzamastsev of the Institute of Pharmacy named after A.P. Nelyubin
Russian Federation, MoscowAnastasia G. Merkushova
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Email: anastasya@myrambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-6791-2200
Student
Russian Federation, MoscowVladimir I. Gegechkori
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Email: gegechkori_v_i@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8437-1148
Candidate of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Chemistry named after A.P. Arzamastsev of the Institute of Pharmacy named after A.P. Nelyubin
Russian Federation, MoscowDmitry V. Chugaev
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Email: chugaev_d_v@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5127-5088
Candidate of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Chemistry named after A.P. Arzamastsev of the Institute of Pharmacy named after A.P. Nelyubin
Russian Federation, MoscowGalina V. Ramenskaya
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University)
Email: ramenskaya_g_v@staff.sechenov.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8779-3573
Doctor of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Institute of Pharmacy named after A.P. Nelyubin
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Liu K.T., Chen C.H. Determination of impurities in pharmaceuticals: Why and how? Quality Management and Quality Control: New Trends and Developments. 2019.
- R Pounikar A., Umekar M.J., Gupta K.R. Genotoxic impurities: an important regulatory aspect. Asian J. of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 2020; 10–25.
- International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q9: Quality Risk Management.
- Patel R., Vhora A., Jain D., Patel R., Khunt D., Patel R., Dyawanapelly S., Junnuthula V. A retrospective regulatory analysis of FDA recalls carried out by pharmaceutical companies from 2012 to 2023. Drug Discovery Today. 2024; 29 (6).
- Wax P.M. Elixirs, diluents, and the passage of the 1938 Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995;122 (6): 456.
- Schier J., Chang A., Kapil V. Medication-associated diethylene glycol mass poisoning – A preventable cause of illness and death. The New England J. of Medicine. 2023; 388 (13): 1156.
- Bowie M.D. Diethylene glycol poisoning in children. 1972.
- Pandya S.K. Letter from Bombay. An unmitigated tragedy. BMJ. 1988; 297 (6641): 117–9.
- Okuonghae H.O., Ighogboja I.S., Lawson J.O., Nwana E.J.C. Diethylene glycol poisoning in Nigerian children. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics. 1992; 12 (3): 235–8.
- World Health Organization. Medical Product Alert No. 8/2023 Substandard (contaminated) syrup and suspension medicines identified in the WHO Regions of the Americas, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia and Western Pacific. 2023.
- Franks M.E., Macpherson G.R., Figg W.D. Thalidomide. The Lancet. 2004; 363 (9423): 1802–11.
- Vargesson N. Thalidomide-induced teratogenesis: History and mechanisms. Birth Defect Res C. 2015; 105: 140–56.
- FDA. DEVELOPMENT OF NEW STEREOISOMERIC DRUGS. Доступно на: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/development-new-stereoisomeric-drugs [Дата обращения 04.08.2024].
- Núñez M. C., Amesty Á., Gómez A. M., López Ó. Rapid development of chiral drugs in the pharmaceutical industry. New Developments in Medicinal Chemistry. 2010; 1: 95–113.
- FDA. WARNING LETTER – November 2018. Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical MARCS-CMS 566685.
- European Medicines Agency. EMA reviewing medicines containing valsartan from Zhejiang Huahai following detection of an impurity. Press release. 2018.
- European Medicines Agency. Update on review of valsartan medicines due to detection of NDMA. European Medicines Agency. 2018.
- Ананьина О.В., Хорольский М.Д., Раменская Г.В., Жуков Е.А., Масленникова Н.В. Определение генотоксичных примесей в фармацевтических субстанциях. Фармация. 2020; 69 (7): 10–6. [Ananyina O.V., Khorolskii M.D., Ramenskaya G.V., Zhukov E.A., Maslennikova N.V. Determination of genotoxic impurities in pharmaceutical substances. Farmatsiya. 2020; 69 (7): 10–6 (in Russian)]
- Рекомендация Коллегии Евразийской экономической комиссии от 6 августа 2019 г. №23 «О Руководстве по оценке и контролю ДНК-реактивных (мутагенных) примесей в лекарственных средствах и установлению границ потенциального канцерогенного риска». [Recommendation of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission dated August 6, 2019, No.23 "On the Guideline for the Assessment and Control of DNA-Reactive (Mutagenic) Impurities in Medicinal Products and the Establishment of Limits of Potential Carcinogenic Risk" (in Russian)]
- Snodin D.J., McCrossen S.D. Guidelines and pharmacopoeial standards for pharmaceutical impurities: Overview and critical assessment. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2012; 63 (2): 298–312.
- Решение Коллегии Евразийской экономической комиссии от 4 октября 2022 г. №138 «Об утверждении Требований к проведению исследований (испытаний) лекарственных средств в части оценки и контроля содержания примесей». [Decision of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission dated October 4, 2022, No.138 "On the Approval of Requirements for Conducting Studies (Tests) of Medicinal Products Regarding the Assessment and Control of Impurity Content" (in Russian)]
- Fifth International Conference of Drug Regulatory Authorities. 10 to 13 October 1989, Senate Building, Luxembourg Gardens, Paris, France. Organized by the Pharmaceutical and Medicine Departments of the Ministry of Solidarity, Health and Welfare, France.
- Teasdale A., Elder D., Nims R.W. ICH Quality Guidelines: An Implementation Guide. John Wiley & Sons. 2017; 1.
- International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q3A(R2): Impurities in New Drug Substances.
- International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q3B(R2): Impurities in New Drug Products.
- Pokar D., Rajput N., Sengupta P. Industrial approaches and consideration of clinical relevance in setting impurity level specification for drug substances and drug products. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2020; 576: 119018.
- European Medicines Agency. ICH guideline M7 on assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk – questions & answers. EMA/CHMP/ICH/321999/2020. 2020.
- Sawyer C., Peto R., Bernstein L., Pike M. C. Calculation of carcinogenic potency from long-term animal carcinogenesis experiments. Biometrics. 1984; 40: 27–40.
- National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Carcinogenic Potency Database (CPDB). Доступно на: https://datadiscovery.nlm.nih.gov/Literature/Carcinogenic-Potency-Database-CPDB-/s5hf-hv94/about_data [Дата обращения 04.08.2024].
- Kroes R., Renwick A.G., Cheeseman M. et al. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2004; 42 (1): 65–83.
- Rationale Statements for Selection of Compounds to be Tested in ILSI Alternatives to Carcinogenicity Testing Program. Toxicologic Pathology. 2001; 29: 323–38.
- Cohen S.M., Robinson D., MacDonald J. Alternative models for carcinogenicity testing. Toxicological Sciences. 2001; 64 (1): 14–9.
- Delaney E.J. An impact analysis of the application of the threshold of toxicological concern concept to pharmaceuticals. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2007; 49 (2): 107–24.
- Savale S.K. Genotoxicity of drugs: Introduction, prediction and evaluation. Asian J. of Biomaterials Research. 2018; 4: 1–29.
- Srinivasan A. Proactive evaluation of possible genotoxic impurities during the early stages of drug development. Pharmaceutical Technology APIs, Excipients, and Manufacturing Supplement. 2019.
- Snodin D.J. A Primer for Pharmaceutical Process Development Chemists and Analysts in Relation to Impurities Perceived to Be Mutagenic or “Genotoxic”. Organic Process Research & Development. 2020; 24 (11): 2407–27.
- Zeiger E. The test that changed the world: The Ames test and the regulation of chemicals. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2019; 841: 43–8.
- International Council for Harmonisation. ICH Q6A: Specifications: Test Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for New Drug Substances and New Drug Products: Chemical Substances.
- Dong X., Tsong Y., Shen M. Statistical considerations in setting product specifications. J. of Biopharmaceutical Statistics. 2015; 25 (2): 280–94.
- Bercu J. et al. Establishing patient centric specifications for drug substance and drug product impurities. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2019; 14: 76–89.
- US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). White paper: FDA pharmaceutical quality oversight. 2015.
- Stegemann, S., Ternik, R.L., Onder, G., Khan, M.A., van Riet-Nales, D.A. Defining Patient Centric Pharmaceutical Drug Product Design. AAPS J. 2016; 18: 1047–55.
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Establishing Impurity Acceptance Criteria. Revision 1. Administrative File. May 2020. Доступно на: https://fda.report/media/124859/5017+2+Rev+1+Establishing+Impurity+Acceptance+Criteria+Admin+5+1+2020.pdf [Дата обращения 04.08.2024].
Supplementary files
