Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Infectious Complications after Large Joints Arthroplasty

Abstract


Surgical outcomes were analyzed for 108 patients with infectious complications developed at different terms after large joints arthroplasty. When complications develop in the early postoperative period than independently of the process depth and in stable implant components radical surgical debridement of the inflammation focus is indicated. In the rest of cases the removal of all implant components with subsequent either joint arthrodesis or revision arthroplasty using spacers of different modifications should be performed. We consider spacer application to be a method of choice as it enables to preserve extremity function and to perform revision arthroplasty in future.

About the authors

I. A Norkin

Saratov Scientific-Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saratov, Russia


S. P Shpinyak

Saratov Scientific-Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saratov, Russia

Email: sergos83@rambler.ru

M. V Girkalo

Saratov Scientific-Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saratov, Russia


A. P Barabash

Saratov Scientific-Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Saratov, Russia


References

  1. Рукин Я.А. Ревизионное эндопротезирование вертлужного компонента тотального эндопротеза тазобедренного сустава при его асептической нестабильности: Дис. … канд. мед. наук. М.; 2011.
  2. Слободской А.Б., Осинцев Е.Ю., Лежнев А.Г. Осложнения после эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава. Вестник травматологии и ортопедии им. Н.Н. Приорова. 2011; 3: 59-63.
  3. Garvin K. Infected total knee arthroplasty: prevention and management; Instr. Course Lect. 2010; 57: 15-27.
  4. Tentino J.R. Prosthetic joint infections: bane of orthopedists, challenge for infectious disease specialists. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003; 36 (9): 319-27.
  5. Ахтямов И.Ф., Кузьмин И.И. Ошибки и осложнения эндопротезирования тазобедренного сустава: Казань: Центр оперативной печати; 2006.
  6. Прохоренко В.М., Павлов В.В. Инфекционные осложнения при эндопротезировании тазобедренного сустава: Новосибирск: Наука; 2010.
  7. Trampuz A., Zimmerli W. Prosthetic joint infections: update in diagnosis and treatment. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2005; 135 (17): 243-51.
  8. Афиногентова А.Г., Даровская Е.Н. Микробные биопленки ран: состояние вопроса. Травматология и ортопедия России; 2011; 3 (61): 119-25.
  9. Hurlow J., Bowler P.G. Clinical experience with wound biofilm and management: a case series. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2009; 55 (4): 38-49.
  10. Надеев А.А., Фитцек Ж. (J. Fitzec), Горбачев В., Иванников С.В., Малютин Д.Н., Надеев А.А. Методика временного замещения имплантатов при ревизии нагноившихся эндопротезов коленного и тазобедренного суставов. Клиническая геронтология; 2008; 2: 47-52.

Statistics

Views

Abstract - 31

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2014 Norkin I.A., Shpinyak S.P., Girkalo M.V., Barabash A.P.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies