Comparative analysis of the functional state of the hand after surgical restoration of the flexor tendons of the fingers
- 作者: Malishevsky V.1,2, Pas’kov R.V3, Sergeev K.S.2
-
隶属关系:
- State Medical and Preventive Institution of the Tyumen region "Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2"
- Tyumen State Medical University
- ФГБОУ ВО Тюменский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России, г. Тюмень, Россия
- 栏目: Original study articles
- ##submission.dateSubmitted##: 22.07.2024
- ##submission.dateAccepted##: 30.07.2025
- ##submission.datePublished##: 30.07.2025
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/634380
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto634380
- ID: 634380
如何引用文章
详细
BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of flexor tendon injuries is accompanied by a high level of unsatisfactory treatment results and disability. It is possible to improve the treatment results by searching for a new suture material. There is a lot of literature data on the possibility of using titanium nickelide-based materials in surgery, but there has not yet been any mention of using titanium nickelide filaments for reconstructive tendon surgery.
AIM: To carry out a comparative analysis of the results of treatment of patients with injuries to the flexor tendons of the three phalangeal fingers of the hand in the area of bone-fibrous channels using a thread made of superelastic titanium nickelide and polypropylene thread.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An interventional, single-center, prospective, controlled, non-randomized clinical trial was conducted, which included 110 patients with damage to the tendons of the deep flexors of the fingers in the area of bone-fibrous channels. The patients were divided into two groups: the main group (n=65), which used a thread made of superelastic titanium nickelide, and the control group (n=45), which used polypropylene. The surgical intervention consisted of repairing tendons using the M-Tang technique using a 6-thread suture, the same for both groups. The follow-up lasted 12 months with control points on days 7–10, 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months. The main endpoint of the study was the restoration of finger function on the Fingersburg scale; the assessment was carried out by measuring active movements in the joints and comparing them with an intact finger. Additionally, grip strength, pinch strength, and DASH questionnaire scores were recorded.
RESULTS: The use of a superelastic titanium nickelide thread for suturing the tendons of the deep flexors of the fingers showed a higher frequency of excellent results (78.5%) and a significantly lower percentage of unsatisfactory outcomes (1.5%) compared with the control group (p=0.042). At the same time, the recovery of grip and pinch strength also turned out to be higher, especially in patients with incised wounds and with early surgical intervention. There were no differences in the quality of life on the DASH scale one year after treatment between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of a clinical study of the functional state of the hand after surgical repair of flexor tendons at the level of fibrous-bone channels are demonstrated, confirming the advantage of the proposed tendon suture technique by reducing the incidence of complications and improving postoperative results.
全文:

作者简介
V. Malishevsky
State Medical and Preventive Institution of the Tyumen region "Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2";Tyumen State Medical University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: mvm9233@ya.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8725-4155
Head of the wrist service of the Regional Clinical Hospital No. 2; Assistant of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Tyumen State Medical University
俄罗斯联邦R. Pas’kov
ФГБОУ ВО Тюменский государственный медицинский университет Минздрава России, г. Тюмень, Россия
Email: paskovroman@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9225-614X
SPIN 代码: 7527-0838
д.м.н., профессор кафедры травматологии и ортопедии ФГБОУ ВО Тюменского государственного медицинского университета Минздрава России
俄罗斯联邦, Тюмень, ул. Одесская, 54Konstantin Sergeev
Tyumen State Medical University
Email: sergeev.trauma@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6621-9449
SPIN 代码: 1432-7708
PhD, professor, head of the department of traumatology and orthopedics with the course of children’s traumatology
俄罗斯联邦, Tyumen参考
- Hurley CM, Reilly F, Callaghan S, Baig MN. Negative predictors of outcomes of flexor tendon repairs. Cureus. 2019;11(3):e4303. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4303
- Kazantaev KE, Nabiev EN, Mukhamedkerim KB, et al. Pathomorphological aspects of flexor tendon injury consequences. Vestn Kazakh Natl Med Univ. 2022;(1):279–85. (In Russ). doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000530
- Chang MK, Tay SC. Flexor tendon injuries and repairs: A single centre experience. J Hand Surg Asian Pac. 2018;23(4):487–95. doi: 10.1142/S2424835518500479
- Bao R, Chen Y, Liu H, et al. A simplified murine model to imitate flexor tendon adhesion formation without suture. Biomimetics (Basel). 2022;7(3):92. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics7030092
- Eisele A, Dereskewitz C, Kus S, et al. Factors affecting time off work in patients with traumatic hand injuries: A bio-psycho-social perspective. Injury. 2018;49(9):1822–9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.012
- Mirzoev MSh, Shakirov MN, Porokhova ED, Dzhonibekova RN. Experimental study of porous-permeable and mesh nickel-titanium integration in vivo. Avicenna Bull. 2020;22(3):434–9. (In Russ). doi: 10.25005/2074-0581-2020-22-3-434-439 EDN: FBHHCA
- Kokorev OV, Günther SV, Khodorenko VN. Effect of surface architecture of porous-permeable NiTi scaffolds on cell biocompatibility. Acta Biomed Sci. 2018;3(3):188–94. doi: 10.29413/ABS.2018-3.3.29 EDN: XRRGKT
- Fedorov PG, Arshakyan VA, Günther VE, Shtofin SG. Modern suture materials (review of literature). Acta Biomed Sci. 2017;2(6):157–62. doi: 10.12737/article_5a0a8e626adf33.46655939 EDN: ZTEHMR
- Nadezhdin SV, Kovaleva MG, Kolpakov AY, Zubareva EV, Khorolskaya EN. Evaluation of biocompatibility and bioresistance of the workpieces of the nickel-titanium implants with modified nanosized surface layers in the in vivo experiments. Biomedicine. 2016;(1):95-101. EDN: WFIUHH
- Panov AA, Podoluzhny VI, Lanshakov VA, Günther VE, Bakhovudinov AKh. Use of superelastic NiTi implants for Achilles tendon ruptures. Siber J Clin Exp Med. 2009;24(3–1):42–4. (In Russ).
- Kaidalov SYu, Lanshakov VA, Panov A. Use of superelastic NiTi implants for knee extensor apparatus injuries. Med Kuzbass. 2013;(1):12–7. (In Russ).
- Chinen S, Shibata S, Tsukamoto T, et al. Effects of different core suture lengths on tensile strength of multistrand flexor tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020;3(1):41–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.10.006
- Tang JB, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Xie RG. Core suture purchase affects strength of tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am. 2005;30(6):1262–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.05.011
- Thangavelu M, Veerasamy N, Kanthan A. Evaluation and management of hand injuries. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2016;5(6):470–3. doi: 10.14260/jemds/2016/1072
- Osei DA, Stepan JG, Calfee RP, Boyer MI, Goldfarb CA, Dardas AZ. Effect of suture caliber and core strand number on flexor tendon repair in zone II: cadaver study. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(2):262–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.11.002
- Malishevsky VM, Paskov RV. Certificate RUS № 2022667777 / 09/26/22. Computer program "FingerSurg": Method for evaluating treatment outcomes after primary flexor tendon repair and early active mobilization protocol using various suture. Available from: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=49775207 (In Russ).
- Kiseleva AN, Nakonechny DG, Weber EV, Ivanov SN, Smirnov SV. Outcomes of flexor tendon repair in hand injuries. Mod Achiev Traumatol Orthop. 2018:118–20. (In Russ).
- Minaev TR, Yuldashev AA, Nizov ON, Petrov AV, Sokolov DS. Reconstructive surgery results for flexor tendon injuries. Emerg Med Bull. 2019;12(3):20–5. (In Russ).
- Marom BS, Ratzon NZ, Carel RS, Sharabi M. Return-to-work barriers among manual workers after hand injuries: 1-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(3):422–32. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.429
- Savvidou C, Tsai TM. Clinical results of flexor tendon repair in zone II using six-strand double loop technique. J Hand Microsurg. 2015;7(1):25–9. doi: 10.1007/s12593-014-0156-0
- Ovsyannikova AD. Rehabilitation and treatment strategy after surgical flexor tendon repair. Reconstr Plast Surg Issues. 2018;21(2):62–73. (In Russ).
- Chesney A, Chauhan A, Kattan A, Farrokhyar F, Thoma A. Systematic review of flexor tendon rehabilitation protocols in zone II of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(4):1583–92. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318208d28e
- Tang JB, Amadio PC, Boyer MI, et al. Current practice of primary flexor tendon repair: global perspective. Hand Clin. 2013;29(2):179–89. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2013.02.003
- Lui PP, Rui YF, Ni M, Chan KM. Tenogenic differentiation of stem cells for tendon repair: current evidence. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2011;5(8):144–63. doi: 10.1002/term.424
- Lloyd-Hughes H, Geoghegan L, Rodrigues J, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in elective hand surgery: systematic review. J Hand Surg Asian Pac. 2019;24(3):329–41. doi: 10.1142/S2424835519500425
- Zinchenko AV, Chernyakova YuM. Biology of tendon healing, biomechanics and rehabilitation after flexor tendon suture. Med News. 2020;10(313):13–9. (In Russ).
- Daluiski A, Do HT, Hernandez-Soria A, Marx R, Lyman S. Epidemiology of reoperation after flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(5):919–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.02.003
- Battiston B, Triolo PF, Bernardi A, Artiaco S, Tos P. Secondary repair of flexor tendon injuries. Injury. 2013;44(3):340–5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.023
- Edsfeldt S, Eklund M, Wiig M. Prognostic factors for digital motion after intrasynovial flexor tendon injury and repair: long-term follow-up. J Hand Ther. 2019;32(3):328–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.12.007
- Bavrina AP, Saperkin NV. Observational epidemiological studies: presentation of results in scientific reporting. Med Almanac. 2021;2(67):83–9. (In Russ).
- Orlov AI. Milestones in the development of statistical methods. Polythematic Online Sci J KubGAU. 2014;(97):73–85. (In Russ).
补充文件
