Antibacterial activity of amicacin, cefotaxime and meropenem impregnated into bone cement discs against gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae

  • Authors: Shipitsyna I.V.1, Osipova E.V.1, Shastov A.L.2, Stogof M.V.3, Sudnitsyn A.S.4
  • Affiliations:
    1. National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after G.A. Ilizarov
    2. Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Academician G.A. Ilizarov" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation,
    3. Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Academician G.A. Ilizarov" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 640014, Kurgan, Russia
    4. Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Academician G.A. Ilizarov" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
  • Section: Original study articles
  • Submitted: 26.03.2025
  • Accepted: 29.04.2025
  • URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-8678/article/view/677727
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/vto677727
  • ID: 677727


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today, there is a need to develop new compositions of bone cements with antibiotics, including those effective against resistant bacterial strains, which would create a local antibacterial environment that helps suppress growth and destroy pathogens without causing toxic reactions.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of amikacin, cefotaxime and meropenem impregnated into bone cement-based discs against gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center, continuous, prospective, unblinded experimental in vitro study was performed. Museum strains of bacteria belonging to 2 taxonomic groups were used as test cultures: Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603. Discs with a diameter of 5 mm and a thickness of 2 mm were made from bone cement (Synicem 1) based on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA); antibiotics were added to the cement in three weight proportions (groups 1, 2 and 3). The antibacterial effect of discs impregnated with antibiotics was assessed against the studied bacterial strains using the disc diffusion method. The experiment was carried out for six days. The results were recorded after 24, 48, 72 and 144 hours.

RESULTS: After 24 hours of the experiment on Petri dishes with disks impregnated with meropenem, amikacin and cefotaxime, a bactericidal effect was observed against P. aeruginosa strains; after 48 hours and on subsequent days of observation, a decrease in the zone of bacterial growth inhibition was noted. With respect to K. pneumoniae strains, there was no growth inhibition zone when using bone cement impregnated with amikacin in groups 1 and 2. An insignificant antibacterial effect was noted when using disks of group 3. Disks with cefotaxime had a weak antibacterial effect. Diffusion of meropenem (groups 2 and 3) and a bactericidal effect were observed for 6 days, a pronounced antibacterial effect was observed on the first day.

CONCLUSIONS: In experiments with P. aeruginosa, all antibiotics, regardless of their content in the disks, were characterized by maximum release during the first day, then the elution rate decreased and remained constant until the end of the experiment. In experiments with K. pneumoniae, the only effective drug was meropenem during the first day of the experiment. Among the studied drugs impregnated in disks with PMMA, only meropenem demonstrated efficacy against P. aeruginosa and K. pneumoniae bacteria, which can be used for local antibacterial therapy. Further in vitro and in vivo studies are necessary to determine the optimal concentration of the antibiotic and clinical efficacy in the prevention and treatment of chronic osteomyelitis.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Irina V. Shipitsyna

National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after G.A. Ilizarov

Author for correspondence.
Email: IVSchimik@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2012-3115
SPIN-code: 3039-5202
Scopus Author ID: 55891336600
ResearcherId: AAH-1004-2020

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Researcher, Scientific-and-Clinical Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology

Russian Federation, Kurgan, Russia

Elena V. Osipova

National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after G.A. Ilizarov

Email: E-V-OsipovA@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2408-4352
SPIN-code: 1146-2236
Scopus Author ID: 56402839200
ResearcherId: AAG-9989-2020

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Sen. Researcher, Scientific-and-Clinical Laboratory of Microbiology and Immunology

Russian Federation, Kurgan, Russia

Aleksander Leonidovich Shastov

Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Academician G.A. Ilizarov" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation,

Email: alshastov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7434-1404
SPIN-code: 4266-8306

candidate of medical sciences, traumatologist-orthopedist, senior researcher at the laboratory of purulent osteology

Russian Federation, 640014, Kurgan, Russia

Maksim Valerievich Stogof

Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Academician G.A. Ilizarov" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 640014, Kurgan, Russia

Email: stogo_off@list.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2602-2457
SPIN-code: 8521-4839

Doctor of Biological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Preclinical and Laboratory Research

 

Russian Federation, 640014, Kurgan, Russia

Anatoly Sergeevich Sudnitsyn

Federal State Budgetary Institution “National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Academician G.A. Ilizarov" Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: anatol_anatol@mail.ru

Candidate of Medical Sciences, Traumatologist-Orthopedist, Head of the Scientific Laboratory, Associate Professor of the Department

Russian Federation, 640014, Kurgan, Russia

References

  1. Mironov SP, Tsiskarashvili AV, Gorbatyuk DS. Chronic post-traumatic osteomyelitis as a problem of modern traumatology and orthopedics (literature review). Genij ortopedii. 2019;25(4):610–621. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-4-610-621
  2. Schmitt SK. Osteomyelitis. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017;31(2):325–338. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2017.01.010
  3. Shipitsyna IV, Osipova EV. Resistance of leading pathogens of chronic osteomyelitis. Clinical laboratory diagnostics. 2022;67(12):723–728. doi: 10.51620/0869-2084-2022-67-12-723-728 EDN: EHQEET
  4. Popkov AV, Shastov AL, Shipitsyna IV, et al. Bactericidal activity of experimental samples of titanium alloy implants with a calcium phosphate coating and an antibacterial component against gram-negative pathogens (experimental study). N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Ortopedics. 2024;31(4):517–526. doi: 10.17816/vto630216 EDN: ACGZAC
  5. Sukhorukova MV, Eidelshtein MV, Ivanchik NV, et al.; MARATHON research group. Antibiotic resistance of nosocomial Enterobacterales strains in Russian hospitals: results of the multicenter epidemiological study MARATHON 2015-2016. Clinical microbiology and antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2019;21(2):147–159. doi: 10.36488/cmac.2019.2.147-159 EDN: QDARVM
  6. Huang CY, Hsieh RW, Yen HT, et al. Short-versus long-course antibiotics in osteomyelitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53(3):246–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.01.007
  7. Cobb LH, McCabe EM, Priddy LB. Therapeutics and delivery vehicles for local treatment of osteomyelitis. J Orthop Res. 2020;38(10):2091–2103. doi: 10.1002/jor.24689
  8. Cara A, Ferry T, Laurent F, Josse J. Prophylactic antibiofilm activity of antibiotic-loaded bone cements against gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(2):137. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020137
  9. Mills DK, Jammalamadaka U, Tappa K, Weisman J. Studies on the cytocompatibility, mechanical and antimicrobial properties of 3D printed poly (methyl methacrylate) beads. Bioact. Mater. 2018;3(2):157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.01.006
  10. Efremov IM, Midlenko VI. Studying strength characteristics of impregnated polymer composition for practical use in the field of purulent surgery. News of higher educational institutions. Volga region. Medical sciences. 2022;(2):83–91. doi: 10.21685/2072-3032-2022-2-9 EDN: BJNMYJ
  11. Zhang J, Feng Y, Zhou X, et al. Research status of artificial bone materials. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. 2021;70(1):37–53. doi: 10.1080/00914037.2019.1685518
  12. Liu Y, He L, Cheng L, et al. Enhancing bone grafting outcomes: a comprehensive review of antibacterial artificial composite bone scaffolds. Med Sci Monit. 2023;29:e939972. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939972
  13. Goldberg MA, Smirnov VV, Krokhicheva PA, et al. Prospects of development and application of calcium and magnesium phosphate bone cements with antimicrobial properties (review). Materials Science. 2020;(7):39–47. doi: 10.31044/1684-579X-2020-0-7-39-47 EDN: IJTYTM
  14. Melikova RE, Tsiskarashvili AV. Local antibacterial depot systems in the treatment of bone and joint infection (literature review). N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Ortopedics. 2024;31(4):677–695. doi: 10.17816/vto632032 EDN: ILAUXQ
  15. Castaneda P, McLaren A, Tavaziva G, Overstreet D. Biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility increases with antimicrobial exposure time. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(7):1659–64. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4700-z
  16. Chen X, Thomsen TR, Winkler H, Xu Y. Influence of biofilm growth age, media, antibiotic concentration and exposure time on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm removal in vitro. BMC Microbiol. 2020;24;20(1):264. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01947-9
  17. Chen IC, Su CY, Nien WH, et al. Influence of antibiotic-loaded acrylic bone cement composition on drug release behavior and mechanism. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(14):2240. doi: 10.3390/polym13142240
  18. Shipitsyna IV, Osipova EV, Leonchuk DS, Sudnitsyn AS. Monitoring of the leading gradual microflora and antibiotic resistance in osteomyelitis. Genij ortopedii. 2020;26(4):544–7. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2020-26-4-544-547 EDN: EKBOTN
  19. Inzana JA, Schwarz EM, Kates SL, Awad HA. Biomaterials approaches to treating implant-associated osteomyelitis. Biomaterials. 2016;81:58–71. doi: 10.1016/J.biomaterials.2015.12.012
  20. Wassif RK, Elkayal M, Shamma RN, Elkheshen SA. Recent advances in the local antibiotics delivery systems for management of osteomyelitis. Drug Deliv. 2021;28(1):2392–2414. doi: 10.1080/10717544.2021.1998246
  21. Suhardi VJ, Bichara DA, Kwok S, et al. A fully functional drug-eluting joint implant. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:0080. doi: 10.1038/s41551-017-0080
  22. Levack AE, Turajane K, Yang X, et al. Thermal stability and in vitro elution kinetics of alternative antibiotics in polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103(18):1694–1704. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00011
  23. Shafigulin RA, Akhtyamov IF, Emelin AL, et al. Elution of antibiotics from bone cement: problems and ways to solution. Genij Ortopedii. 2025;31(1):119–128. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2025-31-1-119-128 EDN: BBNLYW
  24. Stogov MV, Shastov AL, Kireeva EA, Tushina NV. Release of antibiotics from materials for replacing post-osteomyelitic bone defects. Genij ortopedii. 2024;30(6):873–880. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2024-30-6-873-880 EDN: UIOYYM
  25. Dusanea DH, Diamondb SM, Knechtb CS, et al. Effects of loading concentration, blood and synovial fluid on antibiotic release and anti-biofilm activity of bone cement beads. J Control Release. 2017;248:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.01.005
  26. Slane J, Gietman B, Squire M. Antibiotic elution from acrylic bone cement loaded with high doses of tobramycin and vancomycin. J Orthop Res. 2018;36(4):1078–1085. doi: 10.1002/jor.23722
  27. Meeker DG, Cooper KB, Renard RL, et al. Сomparative study of antibiotic elution profiles from alternative formulations of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. J Arthroplast. 2019;34(7):1458–1461. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.008

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.