Long-term clinical outcomes and development of degenerative diseases of the adjacent proximal segment during personalized lumbar transforaminal fusion: A multicenter prospective study

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Long-term clinical outcomes and incidence of degenerative diseases of the adjacent proximal segment during personalized lumbar transforaminal fusion were prospectively assessed. According to the created register, the observational prospective multicenter study included 209 patients who underwent primary open transforaminal lumbar fusion according to generally accepted indications at the LIV–SI vertebral level between 2015 and 2019, and in these patients, adjacent vertebral motion segment had initial degeneration of the adjacent segment in varying severity levels. The risk of developing degenerative adjacent segment disease on the proximal spinal motion segment was assessed using an original method (Patent 2762496 of the Russian Federation, December 21, 2021, Bulletin No. 36). The surgical technique in relation to the adjacent spinal motion segment was determined according to the algorithm for personalized implementation of open transforaminal lumbar fusion. Instrumental parameters were studied in the preoperative period, and development of degenerative adjacent segment disease in the long-term postoperative follow-up was examined at 65 (60–74) months. After a comprehensive assessment of the risk of developing a degenerative adjacent segment disease, monosegmental open transforaminal lumbar fusion was performed in 75 patients, open transforaminal lumbar fusion with interspinous stabilization of the adjacent vertebral motion segment in 69, and involvement of the adjacent vertebral motion segment in rigid stabilization in 65. The incidence of degenerative adjacent segment disease was 4.9% (n = 10). Thus, a comprehensive assessment of the risk of developing degenerative adjacent segment disease and a personalized algorithmic approach to performing open transforaminal lumbar fusion can significantly improve long-term clinical results and reduce the incidence of this degenerative disease in a minimum 5-year follow-up period.

About the authors

Alexey V. Spiridonov

Irkutsk State Medical University; Regional Clinical Hospital of Krasnoyarsk

Email: av_spiridonov@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3244-4688
SPIN-code: 4676-9573

graduate student

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Krasnoyarsk

Yuri Ya. Pestryakov

Irkutsk State Medical University; Regional Clinical Hospital of Krasnoyarsk

Email: pestryakov-nho@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7076-571X
SPIN-code: 8933-1410

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Krasnoyarsk

Andrei A. Kalinin

Irkutsk State Medical University; Railway Clinical Hospital

Email: andrei_doc_v@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6059-4344
SPIN-code: 9707-8291

MD, Cand. Sci. (Med.), associate professor, Department of Neurosurgery

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk

Vadim A. Byvaltsev

Irkutsk State Medical University; Railway Clinical Hospital; Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education – branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution DPO RMANPO of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: byval75vadim@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4349-7101
SPIN-code: 5996-6477

MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.), professor, Department of Neurosurgery

Russian Federation, Irkutsk; Irkutsk; Irkutsk

References

  1. Mittal S, Sudhakar P., Ahuja K, et al. Deformity correction with interbody fusion using lateral versus posterior approach in adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review and observational meta-analysis. Asian Spine J. 2023;17(2):431–451. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0040
  2. Chanbour H, Steinle AM, Tang AR, et al. In single-level, open, posterior lumbar fusion, does transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or posterolateral fusion lead to better outcomes? Neurosurgery. 2023;2(1):110–117. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002187
  3. Rathbone J, Rackham M, Nielsen D, et al. A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF). Eur Spine J. 2023;32(6): 1911–1926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07567-x
  4. Byvaltsev VA, Kalinin AA, Pestryakov YuYa, Spiridonov AV. Analysis of preoperative risk factors of adjacent segment disease after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Voprosy Neirokhirurgii Imeni N.N. Burdenko. 2023;87(2):48–55. (In Russ.) EDN: IKMTFO doi: 10.17116/neiro20238702148
  5. Chan AK, Bydon M, Bisson EF, et al. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5-year follow-up from the prospective multicenter Quality Outcomes Database registry. Neurosurg Focus. 2023;54(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2022.10.FOCUS22602
  6. Jia J, Chen C, Wang P, et al. Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Clin Spine Surg. 2023;36(1):E45–E50. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001351
  7. Cannizzaro D, Anania C.D, Safa A, et al. Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Sci. 2023;67(6):740–749. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05891-X
  8. Kolesov SV, Kazmin АI, Shvets VV, et al. Сomparison of nitinol and titanium nails effectiveness for lumbosacral spine fixation in surgical treatment of degenerative spine diseases. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2019;25(2):59–70. EDN: CMENAA doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-2-59-70
  9. Oh HS, Seo HY. The Relationship between adjacent segment pathology and facet joint violation by pedicle screw after posterior lumbar instrumentation surgery. J Clin Med. 2021;10(13):2911. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132911
  10. Ye J, Yang S, Wei Z, et al. Incidence and risk factors for adjacent segment disease after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:8185–8192. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S337298
  11. Wang H, Ma L, Yang D, et al. Incidence and risk factors of adjacent segment disease following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for degenerative lumbar disorders. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(5):e6032. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006032
  12. Byvaltsev VA, Kalinin AA, Pestryakov YY, et al. Evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes and the incidence of adjacent proximal segment degenerative disease with algorithmic transforaminal interbody fusion: A multicenter prospective study. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2023;14(1):76–83. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_16_23
  13. Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine. (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(17):1873–1878. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200109010-00011
  14. Byvaltsev VA, Belykh EG, Alekseeva NV, Sorokovikov VA. The use of scales and questionnaires in the examination of patients with degenerative lesions of the lumbar spine. Irkutsk: NTsRVKh, 2013. 32 p. (In Russ.)
  15. Takeda K, Okada E, Shinozaki Y, et al. Risk factors for early-onset radiographical adjacent segment disease in patients with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis after single-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2022;22(7):1112–1118. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.02.001
  16. Imagama S, Kawakami N, Matsubara Y, et al. Radiographic adjacent segment degeneration at 5 years after l4/5 posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: evaluation by computed tomography and annual screening with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29(9):e442–e451. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828aec78
  17. Yamasaki K, Hoshino M, Omori K, et al. Risk factors of adjacent segment disease after transforaminal inter-body fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017;42(2):e86–e92. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001728
  18. Makino T, Honda H, Fujiwara H, et al. Low incidence of adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with minimum disc distraction. A preliminary report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(2):e9631. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009631
  19. Masevnin S, Ptashnikov D, Michaylov D, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease development after lumbar fusion. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(2):239–244. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.239
  20. Okuda S, Iwasaki M, Miyauchi A, et al. Risk factors for adjacent segment degeneration after PLIF. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(14):1535–1540. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000131417.93637.9d
  21. Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion. A biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984;9(6):574–581. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198409000-00007
  22. Smith-Petersen MN, Larson EB, AuFranc OE. Osteotomy of the spine for correction of flexion deformity in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1945;27:1–11.
  23. Foreman M, Patel A, Nguyen A, et al. Management considerations for total intervertebral disc replacement. World Neurosurg. 2024;181:125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.100

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77 - 77762 от 10.02.2020.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies