Conditions for the Successful Adaptation of Domestic and Foreign Experience in Assessing Sustainable Regional Development in the Domestic Program-target Concept of Socio-economic Development of the Russian Federation
- Authors: Elkanova E.A.1, Prokhorova I.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 12, No 6 (2022)
- Pages: 71-76
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2223-0092/article/view/535805
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2022-12-6-71-76
- ID: 535805
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to study the conditions for the successful adaptation of domestic and foreign experience in assessing sustainable regional development in the domestic program-target concept of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. At the theoretical level, domestic models for assessing sustainable regional development are considered and their characteristic features are highlighted, which allow us to study a whole range of existing methodological approaches in this area. Also in this paper, the characteristics of foreign models for assessing sustainable regional development are studied, taking into account the analysis of regulatory and legal aspects related to sustainable regional development and the features of its assessment. Within the framework of the implemented research, the authors carried out a comparative analysis of domestic and foreign models in terms of the possibility of adapting experience into the domestic program-target concept of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation. The possibilities and limitations associated with the integration of domestic and foreign methods of assessing the sustainable development of regions among themselves are described. Conclusions. Based on the results obtained, the authors formulated recommendations regarding the creation of conditions for the successful adaptation of domestic and foreign experience in assessing sustainable regional development in the domestic program-target concept of socio-economic development of the Russian Federation.
Full Text
About the authors
Elena A. Elkanova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Email: eaelkanova@fa.ru
Dr. Sci. (Econ.); associate professor at the Department of Logistics and Marketing of the Faculty of Economics and Business Moscow, Russian Federation
Irina G. Prokhorova
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Email: igprokhorova@fa.ru
аssistant at the Department of Sociology of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications Moscow, Russian Federation
References
- Grebenkina S.A. Depressive region: the concept and mechanism of assessment of sustainable development. CITISE. 2019. No. 4. Pp. 108-119. (In Rus.)
- Grebenkina S.A., Khrustalev E.Yu., Slavyanov A.S. Methodological foundations for ensuring sustainable development of the region. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 5: Geography. 2020. No. 1. Pp. 63-72. (In Rus.)
- Denisova E.D., Kupriyanov S.V. Regional development based on the principles of sustainability. Bulletin of the Belgorod State Technological University named after V.G. Shukhov. 2018. No. 7. Pp. 136-142. (In Rus.)
- Leksin V.N. Regional policy of Russia: concepts, problems, solutions. Russian Economic Journal. 1993. No. 9. Pp. 49-53. (In Rus.)
- Tretyakova E.A., Osipova M.Yu. Assessment of indicators of sustainable development of Russian regions. Forecasting Problems. 2018. No. 2 (167). Pp. 24-35. (In Rus.)
- Tyaglov S.G., Konovalenkov S.V. The concept of rapid assessment of sustainable development of the region. Bulletin of the Rostov State University of Economics (RINH). 2019. No. 2 (66). Pp. 147-153. (In Rus.)
- Yakovlev A.S. et al. Land degradation and sustainable development issues. Soil Science. 2018. No. 9. Pp. 1167-1174. (In Rus.)
- Yarasheva A.V. Approaches and definitions of sustainable development of the region’s economy. Economy. Taxes. Law. 2012. No. 2. Pp. 28-31. (In Rus.)
- Bonnet J., Coll-Martínez E., Renou-Maissant P. Evaluating Sustainable Development by Composite Index: Evidence from French Departments // Sustainability. 2021. Pp. 761-780.
- Biotteau A.L. et al. Les personnes les plus aisées sont celles qui bénéficient le plus des mesures socio-fiscales mises en œuvre en 2018, principalement du fait des réformes qui concernent les détenteurs de capital. Insee, France, portrait social // France, portrait social. 2019. Pp. 133-155.
- Barthoulot M. et al. Estimation de la survie globale à partir des données administratives hospitalières avec intégration des données de décès de l’INSEE: l’expérience du Centre Oscar Lambret // Revue d’Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique. 2022. Vol. 70. Pp. 96-99.
- Emovon I., Oghenenyerovwho O.S. Application of MCDM method in material selection for optimal design: A review // Results in Materials. 2020. Vol. 7. Pp. 100-115.
- Martín C.J., Carnero M.C. Evaluation of Sustainable Development in European Union Countries // Appl. Sci. 2019. No. 9. Pp. 880-890.
- Tan T. et al. Combining multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods with building information modelling (BIM): A review // Automation in Construction. 2021. Vol. 121. Pp. 103-112.
- Yasmin M. et al. Big data analytics capabilities and firm performance: An integrated MCDM approach // Journal of Business Research. 2020. Vol. 114. Pp. 1-15.
Supplementary files
