Some aspects of legal and moral & ethical basis of euthanasia in India and South Africa (experience of the BRICS countries)


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article is aimed at identifying of legal framework and ethical problems of euthanasia in two of the five BRICS countries belonging to the Anglo-Saxon system of law - India and South Africa. In this format, the article analyzes the approaches of these countries that create patterns of admissibility of euthanasia, its potential and ethical and legal basis for today, based on analytical reflections on the information gathered from sources and literature from the list of sources and literature. The relevance of this research is due to the fact that a number of approaches to legislation and the judicial acts under study can be useful in finding answers to similar questions related to euthanasia on our, Russian legal order. The analyzed ethical and legal experience is reflected both in historical (1986, 1996, 2011) and in new (2015, 2018) judicial acts. Thus, this study serves to fill the existing gap. The author’s results are presented in the identified partial similarity of approaches based on adherence to the Anglo-Saxon system of law, and differences in the understanding of the grounds for the permissibility of euthanasia. The theoretical and practical significance of the results obtained is determined by the fact that Russian readers will be provided with up-to-date scientific information about the state of the Indian and South African approaches in the field under study, which in practical terms will contribute to understanding the gap (or lack thereof) with the approaches of Russian researchers and practitioners (lawyers, etc.).

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ksenia M. Belikova

Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)

Email: BelikovaKsenia@yandex.ru
Dr. Sci. (Law), Professor; professor of the Department of Civil Law and Proceedings and International Private Law, Law Institute of Law Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Беликова К.М. Защита содержащейся в патентах научной информации средствами, предусмотренными правом ЮАР (подходы стран БРИКС) // Интеллектуальная собственность. Промышленная собственность. 2019. № 8. С. 11-16.
  2. Беликова К.М. К вопросу об эвтаназии в странах БРИКС: правовые и морально-этические рамки в Бразилии, России и Китае // Право и политика. 2020. № 7. С. 13-34. doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.2020.7.33176. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=33176 (дата обращения: 15.06.2020).
  3. Беликова К.М. Процессуальные аспекты защиты научной информации в контексте действия законодательства об интеллектуальной собственности в странах БРИКС: опыт Индии // Право и политика. 2019. № 5. С. 1-17. doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.5.29684. URL: https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=29684 (дата обращения: 30.05.2019).
  4. Беликова К.М. Процессуальные аспекты защиты научной информации, содержащейся в произведениях, охраняемых авторским правом, в ЮАР // Пробелы в российском законодательстве. Юридический журнал. 2019. № 3. С. 227-236.
  5. В ЮАР за убийства осужден активист движения за эвтаназию. 20 июня 2019 г. URL: https://regnum.ru/news/society/2651150.html (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  6. Впервые в ЮАР суд разрешил провести эвтаназию: редакционная статья. 5 мая 2015 г. // Фома. URL: https://foma.ru/vpervyie-v-yuar-sud-razreshil-provesti-evtanaziyu.html (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  7. Гражданское и семейное право развивающихся стран: учеб. пособие / под ред. В.К. Пучинского, В.В. Безбаха. М.: Изд-во УДН, 1989. С. 24.
  8. Папа Франциск запретил католикам Бельгии применять эвтаназию. 15 августа 2017 г. // CNL News. URL: https://cnl.news/365746 (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  9. Экс-архиепископ Кентерберийский выступает за легализацию эвтаназии / пер. с англ. Дацко Д. 14 марта 2017 г. // CNL News. URL: https://cnl.news/364140 (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  10. ЮАР: дебаты об эвтаназии оживились после заявления англиканского архиепископа. 14 октября 2016 г. // CNL News. URL: https://cnl.news/362686 (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  11. Karola A. How can one become chief medical officer in India? June 28, 2017. URL: https://www.quora.com/How-can-one-become-chief-medical-officer-in-India (дата обращения: 03.07.2020).
  12. After 36 years of immobility, a fresh hope of death. The Indian Express: New Delhi. 17 2009. URL: http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/after-36-yrs-of-immobility-a-fresh-hope-of/555048 (дата обращения: 03.07.2020).
  13. Narayan A. Fundamentals of Criminal Procedure Code. June 16, 2016. https://blog.ipleaders.in/fundamentalscriminal-procedure-code/ (data accesses: 28.04.2019).
  14. Culpable Homicide and Murder. Editorial. Law Times Journal. June 25, 2019. URL: https://lawtimesjournal.in/culpablehomicide-and-murder/ (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  15. India allows “living wills” for terminally ill. March 9, 2018. URL: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-43341155 (дата обращения: 04.07.2020) и др.
  16. Erasmus L. In South African law, what is culpable homicide? March 28, 2017. URL: https://www.quora.com/In-South- African-law-what-is-culpable-homicide (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  17. Magnier M. India’s Supreme Court lays out euthanasia guidelines. Los Angeles Times. March 8, 2011. URL: https://www.latimes.com/world/la-xpm-2011-mar-08-la-fg-indiaeuthanasia-20110308-story.html (дата обращения: 03.07.2020).
  18. Kasturi M. Aruna Ramchandra Shanbaug vs. Union of India: Case analysis. January 7, 2015. URL: https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/aruna-ramchandra-shanbaug-v-union-of-india-case-analysis/ (дата обращения: 13.07.2020).
  19. Murder vs. Culpable Homicide. 7, 2016. URL: https://www. clatapult.com/murder-v-culpable-homicide/ (дата обращения: 04.07.2020).
  20. Sareen R. India Decides on Euthanasia: Is the Debate Over? Health Care Current Reviews. 2019. No. 7. P. 245. doi: 10.35248/2375-4273.19.7.245. URL: https://www.longdom.org/open-access/india-decides-on-euthanasia-is-the-debate-over-44121.html (дата обращения: 03.07.2020).
  21. Supreme Court Reports [2012] 1 S.C.R. 1.
  22. Gopal V. When attempt to end life is the start of more problems. Mental Health Care Bill decriminalises suicide attempts but treats it as a mental health issue. January 5, 2014 (updated June 2, 2016). URL: https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/when-attempt-to-end-life-is-the-start-of-more-problems/article5539179.ece#:~:text=The%20Bombay%20High%20Court%20had,to%20live%20a%20forced%20life. (дата обращения: 03.07.2020).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies