RATIO OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF ORGANIZATION OF MUTUAL ADAPTATION OF CIVILIZATIONS IN THE STRATEGY OF THEIR SURVIVAL


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Relevance of the article. Due to globalization the society is developing a strategy for humanity survival. Some civilizations hurry to join somewhat unions, i.e. Turkey and Ukraine to the European Union, others are eager to leave such unions like the United Kingdom hurried out the EU. Objectives of the study. In the survival strategy it becomes necessary to indicate levels for civilizations mutual adoption specification - levels of person, society, nature, West, East, public and private property, as well as between states, steady excess of mortality over birth rate, depopulation and demographic explosion, between religious organizations, political and geopolitical unions. Research model. Globally there is no unified and consequent strategy for civilizations survival which could determine mutual cultural adoption possibilities, the next scientific and technological revolution challenges and be of essential importance for European society in Islamophobia conditions. Islamophobia is partially a by-product of power and rivalry between the political elites of Europe and the United States in the era after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Conclusions. Over the past decades intercultural dialogue and adaptation possibilities of Eastern civilization have been sharply decreasing in the context of liberal ideology rejection in the morality, politics, law and degrading Western mentality over-dictatorship spheres. Non-eventual general mutual adoption of civilizations based on Western values as well as destroyed states - Iraq, Libya, Syria, Afghanistan - are the evidence. Originality of the article. The authors of the article offer a future strategy for the humanity survival and remind of what is worth living for. The mutual civilizations integration is meant to be a life strategy and the development of civilizations as a tactic allowing the living to be kept in a certain evolutionary framework thus ensuring whole society progress possibility.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Clara A. Azhybekova

Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University

Email: klaraagibekova@mail.ru
Doctor in Philosophy, Professor, Academician, Russian Public Science Academy

Osmon A. Togusakov

National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic

Email: tousakov@yandex.ru
Doctor in Philosophy, Professor, Corresponding Member

Denis A. Brusilovskiy

Kyrgyz-Russian Slavic University

Email: denis6605@mail.ru
PhD, Assistant Professor, UNESCO Department of World Cultures and Religions

Nazgul S. Akmatova

Institute of philosophy and political legal studies of the National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic

Email: nazgul-akmatova@bk.ru
PhD, senior researcher

Alexey N. Smutko

Institute of philosophy and political legal studies of the National Academy of Sciences of the Kyrgyz Republic

Email: alesha.smutko@yandex.com
PhD, head of department

References

  1. Žižek S. Absolute Recoil: Towards A New Foundation Of Dialectical Materialism. London, 2014. 415 pp.
  2. Pfaller R. On The Pleasure Principle In Culture: Illusions Without Owners. London / New York, 2014. 288 pp.
  3. Ферри Л. Краткая история мысли. Трактат по философии для подрастающего поколения / пер. с франц. С. Рындина. М., 2018. 272 с.
  4. Пфаллер Р. Ради чего стоит жить. Начала материалистической философии / пер. с нем.; под науч. ред. А. Смирнова. М., 2018. 384 с.
  5. Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций / пер. с англ. Т. Велимеева. М., 2018. 640 с.
  6. Bazian H. Islamophobia, “Clash of Civilizations”, and Forging a Post-Cold War Order! // Religions. 2018. Vol. 9(9), iss. 282. P. 1-13.
  7. Grosfoguel R, Mielants E. The Long-Durée Entanglement Between Islamophobia and Racism in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist/Patriarchal World-System: An Introduction // Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge. Vol. 5, iss. 1/2. 2006. P. 1-12.
  8. Grosfoguel R, Oso L, Christou A. “Racism”, Intersectionality and Migration Studies: Framing Some Theoretical Reflections // Identities-Global Studies in Culture and Power. 2015. Vol. 22, iss. 6. P. 635-652.
  9. Ажыбекова К.А., Брусиловский Д.А., Есипов И.И. Методология адаптации мусульман-мигрантов к европейской культуре // Евразийский юридический журнал. 2017. № 7 (110). С. 351-355.
  10. Брусиловский Д.А. Возможности ислама в контексте внутрирелигиозного, межрелигиозного и межкультурного диалога в современную эпоху // Общество: философия, история, культура. 2016. № 10. С. 16-22.
  11. Flynn M.T., Ledeen M. The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies. New York, 2016. 208 p.
  12. Хантингтон С. Столкновение цивилизаций / пер. с англ. Т. Велимеева. М., 2016. 640 с.
  13. Пфаллер Р. Ради чего стоит жить. Начала материалистической философии / пер. с нем.; под науч. ред. А. Смирнова. М., 2018. 384 с.
  14. Лейбниц Г.В. Сочинения : в 4 т. Т.4. М., 1989. 554 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies