Features protecting rights in the sphere of family relations: status and prospects
- Authors: Letova N.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
- Issue: Vol 14, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 76-82
- Section: Human Rights
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2223-0092/article/view/635471
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.33693/2223-0092-2024-14-3-76-82
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IXAFNH
- ID: 635471
Cite item
Abstract
Purpose of the study. The article identifies problems of theory and practice related to the consideration of cases in courts for the protection of rights arising in the field of family legal relations. The author substantiates the conclusion about the need to determine the specifics of justice in family cases, especially with the participation of minors, which is due to the participation of special bodies and authorized persons who ensure the protection of the family rights of citizens. The author has proven that effective protection of family rights is possible subject to the balanced use of different forms (jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional), including alternative methods, which essentially corresponds to the nature of family relations and contributes to the adoption of legal and informed decisions that meet the rights and legitimate interests of citizens.
Full Text
![Restricted Access](https://journals.eco-vector.com/lib/pkp/templates/images/icons/text_lock.png)
About the authors
Natalie V. Letova
Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Author for correspondence.
Email: letovanv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7033-977X
Dr. Sci. (Law); chief researcher, Procedural Law Sector
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Sherstyuk V.M. Theoretical problems of the development of civil procedural, arbitration procedural law and enforcement proceedings in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2021.
- Shakaryan M.S. Civil procedural law of Russia. Moscow, 1996.
- Chechot D.M. Selected works on civil procedure. St. Petersburg, 2005.
- Pchelintseva L.M. Family law of Russia: Textbook for universities. Moscow, 2000.
- Sitkova O.Yu. Ways to protect family rights. Vestnik VGU. Series: Law. 2014. No. 2. (In Rus.)
- Subbotina E.V. Features of the exercise of rights and fulfillment of duties in marriage and family relations. Family and Housing Law. 2012. No. 3. (In Rus.)
- Shershen T.V. The significance of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the protection of family rights. Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Law. 2010. No. 2. (In Rus.)
- Chirkin V.E. Public power in modern society. Journal of Russian Law. 2009. No. 7. (In Rus.)
- Tikhomirov Yu.A. Public law. Moscow: BEK, 1995.
- Karpova O.A., Balayan E.Yu. The place of guardianship and trusteeship bodies for minors in the system of public authorities of the Russian Federation. State Power and Local Self-Government. 2023. No. 4. (In Rus.)
- Melnikova M.B. Responsibility of guardianship and trusteeship authorities for violation of the rights of minors. Legality. 2019. No. 9. (In Rus.)
- Grishin A.V. Current problems of legal regulation of the activities of guardianship and trusteeship authorities to protect the inheritance rights of minors. Inheritance Law. 2019. No. 3. (In Rus.)
- Bakhareva O.A. Settlement of family disputes through mediation. Arbitration and Civil Process. 2017. No. 7. (In Rus.)
- Borisova E.A. Mandatory family mediation as a premonition. Legislation. 2021. No. 5. (In Rus.)
- Velichkova O.I. Improving family legislation on mediation issues. Current Problems of Russian Law. 2017. No. 5. (In Rus.)
- Chekmareva A.V. Problems of reconciliation of the parties when preparing a civil case for trial. Modern Law. 2018. No. 4. (In Rus.)
- Nadin I.N. An assessment and information meeting as a condition for exercising the right to go to family court. UK experience. Magistrate. 2022. No. 9. (In Rus.)
Supplementary files
![](/img/style/loading.gif)