Features protecting rights in the sphere of family relations: status and prospects

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Purpose of the study. The article identifies problems of theory and practice related to the consideration of cases in courts for the protection of rights arising in the field of family legal relations. The author substantiates the conclusion about the need to determine the specifics of justice in family cases, especially with the participation of minors, which is due to the participation of special bodies and authorized persons who ensure the protection of the family rights of citizens. The author has proven that effective protection of family rights is possible subject to the balanced use of different forms (jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional), including alternative methods, which essentially corresponds to the nature of family relations and contributes to the adoption of legal and informed decisions that meet the rights and legitimate interests of citizens.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Natalie Letova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: letovanv@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7033-977X

Dr. Sci. (Law); chief researcher, Procedural Law Sector

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Sherstyuk V.M. Theoretical problems of the development of civil procedural, arbitration procedural law and enforcement proceedings in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2021.
  2. Shakaryan M.S. Civil procedural law of Russia. Moscow, 1996.
  3. Chechot D.M. Selected works on civil procedure. St. Petersburg, 2005.
  4. Pchelintseva L.M. Family law of Russia: Textbook for universities. Moscow, 2000.
  5. Sitkova O.Yu. Ways to protect family rights. Vestnik VGU. Series: Law. 2014. No. 2. (In Rus.)
  6. Subbotina E.V. Features of the exercise of rights and fulfillment of duties in marriage and family relations. Family and Housing Law. 2012. No. 3. (In Rus.)
  7. Shershen T.V. The significance of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the protection of family rights. Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Law. 2010. No. 2. (In Rus.)
  8. Chirkin V.E. Public power in modern society. Journal of Russian Law. 2009. No. 7. (In Rus.)
  9. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Public law. Moscow: BEK, 1995.
  10. Karpova O.A., Balayan E.Yu. The place of guardianship and trusteeship bodies for minors in the system of public authorities of the Russian Federation. State Power and Local Self-Government. 2023. No. 4. (In Rus.)
  11. Melnikova M.B. Responsibility of guardianship and trusteeship authorities for violation of the rights of minors. Legality. 2019. No. 9. (In Rus.)
  12. Grishin A.V. Current problems of legal regulation of the activities of guardianship and trusteeship authorities to protect the inheritance rights of minors. Inheritance Law. 2019. No. 3. (In Rus.)
  13. Bakhareva O.A. Settlement of family disputes through mediation. Arbitration and Civil Process. 2017. No. 7. (In Rus.)
  14. Borisova E.A. Mandatory family mediation as a premonition. Legislation. 2021. No. 5. (In Rus.)
  15. Velichkova O.I. Improving family legislation on mediation issues. Current Problems of Russian Law. 2017. No. 5. (In Rus.)
  16. Chekmareva A.V. Problems of reconciliation of the parties when preparing a civil case for trial. Modern Law. 2018. No. 4. (In Rus.)
  17. Nadin I.N. An assessment and information meeting as a condition for exercising the right to go to family court. UK experience. Magistrate. 2022. No. 9. (In Rus.)

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML


##common.cookie##