Features protecting rights in the sphere of family relations: status and prospects

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Purpose of the study. The article identifies problems of theory and practice related to the consideration of cases in courts for the protection of rights arising in the field of family legal relations. The author substantiates the conclusion about the need to determine the specifics of justice in family cases, especially with the participation of minors, which is due to the participation of special bodies and authorized persons who ensure the protection of the family rights of citizens. The author has proven that effective protection of family rights is possible subject to the balanced use of different forms (jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional), including alternative methods, which essentially corresponds to the nature of family relations and contributes to the adoption of legal and informed decisions that meet the rights and legitimate interests of citizens.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Natalie Letova

Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: letovanv@mail.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0001-7033-977X

Dr. Sci. (Law); chief researcher, Procedural Law Sector

Rússia, Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Sherstyuk V.M. Theoretical problems of the development of civil procedural, arbitration procedural law and enforcement proceedings in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2021.
  2. Shakaryan M.S. Civil procedural law of Russia. Moscow, 1996.
  3. Chechot D.M. Selected works on civil procedure. St. Petersburg, 2005.
  4. Pchelintseva L.M. Family law of Russia: Textbook for universities. Moscow, 2000.
  5. Sitkova O.Yu. Ways to protect family rights. Vestnik VGU. Series: Law. 2014. No. 2. (In Rus.)
  6. Subbotina E.V. Features of the exercise of rights and fulfillment of duties in marriage and family relations. Family and Housing Law. 2012. No. 3. (In Rus.)
  7. Shershen T.V. The significance of decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the protection of family rights. Bulletin of Omsk University. Series: Law. 2010. No. 2. (In Rus.)
  8. Chirkin V.E. Public power in modern society. Journal of Russian Law. 2009. No. 7. (In Rus.)
  9. Tikhomirov Yu.A. Public law. Moscow: BEK, 1995.
  10. Karpova O.A., Balayan E.Yu. The place of guardianship and trusteeship bodies for minors in the system of public authorities of the Russian Federation. State Power and Local Self-Government. 2023. No. 4. (In Rus.)
  11. Melnikova M.B. Responsibility of guardianship and trusteeship authorities for violation of the rights of minors. Legality. 2019. No. 9. (In Rus.)
  12. Grishin A.V. Current problems of legal regulation of the activities of guardianship and trusteeship authorities to protect the inheritance rights of minors. Inheritance Law. 2019. No. 3. (In Rus.)
  13. Bakhareva O.A. Settlement of family disputes through mediation. Arbitration and Civil Process. 2017. No. 7. (In Rus.)
  14. Borisova E.A. Mandatory family mediation as a premonition. Legislation. 2021. No. 5. (In Rus.)
  15. Velichkova O.I. Improving family legislation on mediation issues. Current Problems of Russian Law. 2017. No. 5. (In Rus.)
  16. Chekmareva A.V. Problems of reconciliation of the parties when preparing a civil case for trial. Modern Law. 2018. No. 4. (In Rus.)
  17. Nadin I.N. An assessment and information meeting as a condition for exercising the right to go to family court. UK experience. Magistrate. 2022. No. 9. (In Rus.)

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML


Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies