Russian Version of Oswestry Questionnaire: Test Validity and Reliability



Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of the study was the evaluation of Russian Oswestry questionnaire (disability index) version 2.1a reliability. Evaluation was performed on the basis of prospective cohort examination of 101 patients. All patients were questioned at the time of first examination, within 2-5 days after first visit and after completion treatment. Repetition of results, internal consistency of the test, correlation with visual analog scale (VAS) and SF-36 questionnaire subscales were studied. Repetition of results made up 0.96, Cronbach's a coefficient - 0.919, correlation with VAS - 0.668. Adapted of Russian Oswestry questionnaire version 2.1a is a valid and reliable tool. It is recommended for application in practical and scientific work for the evaluation of vital activity disturbances in patients with low back pains. The study was approved by Prof. J. Fairbank, the author of Oswestry questionnaire.

References

  1. Белова А.Н. Шкалы, тесты и вопросники в неврологии и нейрохирургии. - М., 2004.
  2. Черепанов Е.А. Русская версия опросника Освестри: культурная адаптация и валидность //Хирургия позвоночника. - 2009. - N 3. - С. 91-98.
  3. Beurskens A.J., de Vet H.C., Koke A.J. et al. Measuring the functional status of patients with low back pain. Assessment of the quality of four disease-specific questionnaires //Spine. - 1995. - Vol. 20. - P. 1017-1028.
  4. Bogduk N. Draft evidence based clinical guidelines for the management of acute low back pain. - Australia: National Health and Medical Research Council, 1999.
  5. Co Y.Y., Eaton S., Maxwell M.W. The relationship between the St. Thomas and Oswestry disability scores and the severity of low back pain //J. Manipul. Phys. Ther. - 1993. - Vol. 16. - P. 14-18.
  6. Fairbank J.C., Couper J., Davies J.B. et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire //Physiotherapy. - 1980. - Vol. 66. - P. 271-273.
  7. Fairbank J.C., Pynsent P.B. The Oswestry disability index //Spine. - 2000. - Vol. 25. - P. 2940-2952.
  8. Grevitt M., Khazim R., Webb J. et al. The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery //J. Bone Jt Surg. - 1997. - Vol. 79B. - P. 48-52.
  9. Gronblad M., Hupli M., Wennerstrand P. et al. Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain disability index (PDI) and the Oswestry disability questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients //Clin. J. Pain. - 1993. - Vol. 9. - P. 189-195.
  10. Guyatt G.H., Berman L.B., Townsend M. et al. Should study subjects see their previous responses? //J. Chronic Dis. - 1985. - Vol. 38. - P. 1003-1007.
  11. Jaeschke R., Singer J., Guyatt G. A comparison of seven-point and visual analogue scales. Data from a ran-domized trial //Control Clin. Trials. - 1990. - Vol. 11. - P. 43-51.
  12. Jeon C.H., Kim D.J., Kim S.K. et al. Validation in the cross-cultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Oswestry disability index //J. Korean Med. Sci. - 2006. - Vol. 21. - P. 1092-1097.
  13. Kopec J.A., Esdaile J.M., Abrahamowicz M. et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development //J. Clin. Epidemiol. - 1996. - Vol. 49. - P. 151-161.
  14. Fairbank J.C.T., Pynsent P.B., Disney S. Oswestry disability index. - http://www.orthosurg.org.uk/odi/

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2011 Eco-Vector


СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies