Comparative assessment of the effectiveness and safety of combined drugs in wound healing and prevention of wound infection after explosive and gunshot injuries



Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infected wounds, including the consequences of explosive and gunshot injuries, as well as diabetic foot syndrome, represent a serious medical problem due to the high risk of complications and long-term patient care. In this regard, the search for effective and safe methods of local therapy remains relevant. In this study a comparative assessment of the effectiveness of the use of some combined antibacterial drugs and antiseptic agents in the treatment of such wounds was carried out, with an analysis of their effect on tissue regeneration, microbial load and clinical outcomes.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined drugs of Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Lidocaine + Ofloxacin; Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Chloramphenicol and Povidone-Iodine in the treatment of infected wounds of various origins.

METHODS: A single-center, open, non-interventional, observational, randomized, controlled study was conducted involving 60 patients (40 with explosive / gunshot wounds and 20 with diabetic foot syndrome). Three drugs were selected for comparison (Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Lidocaine + Ofloxacin, Oflomelid, “Sintez” PJSC, Russia; Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Chloramphenicol, Levomikol, Nizhpharm JSC, Russia, and Povidone-Iodine, Betadine, Egis Pharmaceuticals PLC, Hungary). The treatment included daily wound care during the observation period. The dynamics of wound healing (area, depth, volume of exudation), pain syndrome, microbiological and biochemical parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS: The use of the combination Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Lidocaine + Ofloxacin was accompanied by statistically more pronounced results in the dynamics of wound healing: a decrease in the area (p <0.001) and depth (p=0.008) of wounds, as well as the intensity of exudation (72.7% of patients without exudate by the 4th visit). When assessing pain syndrome, the reduction of pain was more pronounced in the group of the combination Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Lidocaine + Ofloxacin (p <0.001). All drugs effectively suppressed the growth of Staphylococcus aureus, but combined antibacterial agents demonstrated 20% better results compared to antiseptic agent. Laboratory parameters improved in all groups, but anti-streptolysin-O decreased significantly when using the combination of Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Lidocaine + Ofloxacin (p=0.009).

CONCLUSION: All the studied drugs are effective and safe, but the combination of Dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine + Lidocaine + Ofloxacin demonstrated the best results in terms of key parameters: accelerated healing, reduced bacterial load, and improved subjective assessments. Its combined composition (antibiotic + regenerant + anesthetic) makes it the preferred choice for complex infected wounds treatment, including the consequences of injuries and diabetic foot.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Mikhail Viktorovich Parshikov

Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: parshikovmikhail@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4201-4577
SPIN-code: 5838-4366
Scopus Author ID: 57211136303

Professor, Professor of the Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Medicine

Russian Federation, 4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow, 127006

mikhail Vladimirovich Govorov

Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: gmv99@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4873-3230
SPIN-code: 5444-1777
Scopus Author ID: 57215650951

Associate Professor of the Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Disaster Medicine

Russian Federation, 4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow, 127006

Nikolay Vkadimirovich Yarygin

Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: jarigin_nv@rosunimed.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4322-6985
SPIN-code: 3258-4436
Scopus Author ID: 56769781400

Professor, Head of the Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Disaster Medicine

4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow, 127006

Arsenty B. Koshkin

Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: febris@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7616-2255
SPIN-code: 4561-6000
Scopus Author ID: 59068557100

Assistant Professor of Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Disaster Medicine

Russian Federation, 4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow, 127006

Oleg Dmitrievich Podkosov

Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: oleg.podkosov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8980-6083
SPIN-code: 1254-0073
Scopus Author ID: 57223240994

Assistant Professor of Traumatology, Orthopedics, and Disaster Medicine

Russian Federation, 4 Dolgorukovskaya St., Moscow, 127006

References

  1. Kuzin MI, Kostyuchyonok BM, editors. Wounds and wound infections: Manual for physicians. 2nd ed., amended and supplemented. Moscow: Medicine; 1990. 592 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Surgical infections of the skin and soft tissues. Russian national guidelines. 2nd edition, revised and expanded. Russian Society of Surgeons. Russian Association of Surgical Infection Specialists. Moscow; 2015, 109 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Khachatryan NN, Dizengof IM, Smirnov GG, Lazutkina LI, Fesenko TA. Features of anti-bacterial therapy for surgical infections of the skin and soft tissues. Consilium Medicum. 2011;13(4):22–26. (In Russ.) EDN: RALJFH
  4. Khatsko VV, Potapov VV, Zenin OK. Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis of sepsis (literature review). Medical sciences. 2017;43(3):139–150. (In Russ.) doi: 10.21685/2072-3032-2017-3-15
  5. Trishkin D.V, Kryukov Е.V., Alexeyev DЕ, et al. Military field surgery. National leadership. 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2024. 1056 p. (In Russ.) doi: 10.33029/9704-8036-6-VPX-2024-1-1056 EDN: AYGYWM
  6. Weintrob AC, Murray CK, Xu J, et al. Early Infections Complicating the Care of Combat Casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2018;19(3):286–297. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.240
  7. Yeryukhin IA, Gelfand BR, Shlyapnikov SA, editors. Surgical infections: a guide. St. Petersburg: Peter; 2003. 864 p. (In Russ.).
  8. Cherkashin DV, Chumakov AV, et al. Transformation of the concept of focal infection at the turn of the century transformation of the concept of focal infection at the turn of the century. St. Petersburg: Politekhnika; 2021. 500 p. doi: 10.25960/7325-1183-3 EDN: CYSPXS
  9. Tamrazova OB, Stadnikova AS, Gureeva MA, Nikitin IS. Modern aspects of treatment of purulent wounds with combined drugs. Russian Journal of Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2020;19(6):905–913. doi: 10.17116/klinderma202019061905 EDN: XWTRCM
  10. Lychagin AV, Podkosov OD, Krochek IV, Nabatchikov NA, Petrov PI. Current trends in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic osteomyelitis of limb bones. literature Review. Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2023;(1):83–89. doi: 10.17238/2226-2016-2023-1-83-89 EDN: UAHDKB
  11. Mozhayev DA. Report. Results of post-marketing clinical application of the Oflomelid ointment for treatment of patients with trophic ulcers of the venous etiology. Samara; 2013. 14 p. (In Russ.)
  12. Prilepina EV. Effectiveness of local treatment of purulent wounds with use of ointment "Oflomelid". Bulletin of the Council of Young Scientists and Specialists of the Chelyabinsk region. 2017;18(3):139–142. (In Russ.)
  13. Patent RUS No. 2262353 C2/ 20.10.2005. Byul. No. 29. Blatun LA, Kozlov RS, Mironov AYu, Samsonova LN. Pharmaceutical composition with antibacterial, wound healing and analgesic effect. 8 p. (In Russ.)
  14. Muromtseva EV, Sergatskiy KI, Nikol'skiy VI, et al. Wound treatment depending on the phase of the wound process. University proceedings. Volga region. Medical sciences. 2022;(3):93–109. doi: 10.21685/2072-3032-2022-3-9 EDN: CBPSIU
  15. Daeschlein G. Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management. J Wound Care. 2013;22(Suppl 8a):S1–26. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2013.22.Sup8.S1
  16. Blatun LA, Petrov VK, Sidorova MN. Modern approaches to the treatment of wounds and wound infections. Wounds and wound infections. 2015;2(1):15–23. (In Russ.).
  17. Norman G, Christie J, Liu Z, et al. Antiseptics for burns. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD011821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011821.pub2
  18. Ivanusa SN The dynamics of the wound process: from vascular reactions to repair. St. Petersburg: Biomed; 2017. 178 p. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-76249 от 19.07.2019.