Clinical nutrition and metabolism
Peer-review quarterly medical journal.
Editor-in-chief
- Prof. Sergey V. Sviridov, MD, Dr. Sci. (Med.)
ORCID: 0000-0002-9976-8903
Association
- Published under the supervision of National Association Organizations of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (RSPEN)
https://russpen.ru/
Journal founders
- Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology
- Eco-Vector Publishing Group
Publisher
- Eco-Vector
WEB: https://eco-vector.com/
About
The purpose of this peer-review academic medical journal is to publish up-to-date information on modern approaches to nutritional support for various conditions and diseases.
The target audience of the journal is specialists in the field of anesthesiology & resuscitation, pulmonology, surgery, oncology, neurology, gastroenterology, dietetics, pediatrics, therapy, as well as general practitioners.
Types of accepted articles
- reviews
- systematic reviews and metaanalyses
- original research
- clinical case reports and series
- letters to the editor
- short communications
- clinial practice guidelines
Publications
- in English and Russian
- quarterly, 4 issues per year
- continuously in Online First
- with NO Article Processing Charges (APC)
- distribution in Open Access, under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0)
Indexation
- Russian Science Citation Index
- Russian Science Electronic Library (eLibrary.ru)
- Google Scholar
- Ulrich's Periodicals directory
- Dimensions
- Crossref
Current Issue
Vol 5, No 4 (2024)
- Year: 2024
- Articles: 5
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2658-4433/issue/view/9783
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinutr.54
Full Issue
Original Study Articles
Survey results of anesthesiologists–intensivists on the nutritional support practice
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adequate compensation for protein-energy losses and timely correction of metabolic disorders are key components of intensive care for critically ill patients. Currently, nutritional support (NS) is regarded as an essential component of intensive care for critically ill patients, as it helps reduce the incidence of infectious complications, shorten the duration of hospitalization, lower treatment costs, and improve survival rates. However, the practical implementation of NS in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting is associated with various organizational challenges and requires specific professional knowledge and skills to minimize the risk of technical and metabolic complications.
AIM: The work aimed to assess the theoretical knowledge and practical skills of anesthesiologists–intensivists in providing NS to patients in ICUs of healthcare institutions in the Russian Federation.
METHODS: This multicenter cross-sectional observational study was conducted via an anonymous remote survey. A total of 121 certified anesthesiologists-intensivists actively working in ICUs participated between September 4 and September 18, 2018. The survey evaluated physician adherence to NS practices, the frequency of monitoring protein-energy balance, the level of knowledge regarding NS, and the impact of material and technical resources on its effectiveness. Data were analyzed by comparing responses among three groups of participants.
RESULTS: In current clinical practice, anesthesiologists-intensivists employ various methods to assess patients’ nutritional status, although none are universally accepted. According to the data obtained, not all physicians routinely assess patients’ protein and energy needs—such assessments are conducted by 80% and 72% of respondents, respectively. A significant issue identified was the insufficient provision of ICU equipment for administering NS. One-third of respondents rated the availability of specialized formulas for parenteral and enteral nutrition in their hospitals as unsatisfactory. Notably, the vast majority of respondents (98%) expressed a desire to improve their knowledge in the field of NS, indicating the high relevance of this topic within the professional community.
CONCLUSION: The study revealed that many practicing physicians often lack sufficient theoretical knowledge regarding the practical implementation of NS. The material and technical support in ICUs remains unsatisfactory, with a shortage of nutritional formulas and equipment necessary for the adequate administration of enteral and parenteral nutrition.



Energy requirements in patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer prior to radical surgery as assessed by indirect calorimetry
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nutritional support (NS) is an essential component of prehabilitation before surgical intervention in cancer patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancer who have completed neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). However, their actual energy requirements remain poorly understood.
AIM: The work aimed to determine energy requirements using indirect calorimetry (IC) in patients with malignant tumors of the upper GI tract who had completed NACT and were scheduled for radical surgical intervention.
METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional, single-center study included patients with upper GI tract cancer who completed NACT and were scheduled for radical surgery. Upon admission, body weight and height were measured. Body mass index (BMI) and weight loss over the preceding six months (as % of usual body weight) were calculated. Energy requirements were assessed via IC and also calculated using the Harris–Benedict equation with stress factors. The degree of protein-energy malnutrition (PEM) was classified according to GLIM criteria. Daily energy intake was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2011. Data are presented as Me [Q1; Q3].
RESULTS: A total of 42 patients (24 males) were assessed; median age was 64 years [57; 72]. Esophageal cancer was diagnosed in 26 patients (61.9%), gastric cancer in 16 (38.1%). Median 6-month weight loss was 11.53% [8.62; 20.04], BMI was 24 [19.5; 26.88] kg/m2. IC-based basal metabolic rate (BMR) was 1485.5 [1327.75; 1622.25] kcal/day; actual energy requirement (AER) was 1960.86 [1752.63; 2141.37] kcal/day, or 28.37 [26.23; 32.78] kcal/kg. According to the Harris–Benedict equation, BMR was 1391.43 [1264.22; 1525.49] kcal/day, AER was 1836.69 [1668.78; 2013.64] kcal/day, or 27.35 [25.73; 30.24] kcal/kg. Caloric intake was 1232.00 [967.00; 1479.25] kcal/day, or 18.91 [15.90; 21.18] kcal/kg. The IC method yielded greater variability compared to calculated estimates. Moderate PEM was diagnosed in 15 patients (35.7%), and severe PEM in 27 (64.3%).
CONCLUSION: Patients with upper GI tract cancer who have undergone NACT present with PEM, the primary diagnostic criterion being unintentional weight loss over the preceding six months. IC-based BMR measurements provide more individualized results than those derived from the Harris–Benedict equation.



Reviews
Issues of diagnosis and correction of hypomagnesemia in the intensive care unit patients
Abstract
Various electrolyte imbalances, including changes in magnesium levels, are characteristic of critically ill patients. However, routine measurement of magnesium concentration is often omitted, which may result in the development of hypomagnesemia.
We conducted a review of the medical scientific data on this issue to present the current state of knowledge.
To address the stated objectives, a scientific data search was performed in the eLIBRARY.RU and PubMed databases covering the period from 1975 to 2024. Articles in English and Russian were analyzed using the following keywords: “hypomagnesemia”, “electrolyte imbalance”, “potassium”, “sodium”, and “intensive care unit”. Full-text articles describing hypomagnesemia in critically ill adult patients in the general population, excluding obstetric conditions, were included in the analysis.
The results of the analysis showed that in this patient category, hypomagnesemia is associated with increased mortality, higher incidence of sepsis, prolonged mechanical ventilation, longer hospital stays, and elevated one-year post-discharge mortality rates. In this regard, routine magnesium assessment should be mandatory for intensive care unit patients with gastrointestinal, endocrine, and cardiovascular diseases, as well as with acute kidney injury or exacerbation of chronic kidney disease. Further research is required to clarify the therapeutic role of magnesium in improving outcomes for critically ill patients.



Nutritional support in acute pancreatitis: a review of clinical guidelines
Abstract
In recent years, nutritional support in acute pancreatitis has undergone significant changes. For a long time, treatment was based on the concept of pancreatic rest, which implied fasting and total parenteral nutrition. However, recent studies have demonstrated a clear advantage of early oral or enteral feeding. Nevertheless, many issues related to the tactics and composition of nutritional support remain unresolved.
This review presents current data on nutritional support as part of comprehensive therapy for acute pancreatitis. A scientific data search was conducted in the eLIBRARY.RU, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases using the keywords: “acute pancreatitis,” “nutritional support,” “probiotics,” “glutamine,” “omega-3 fatty acids” and “guidelines”.
The analysis showed that oral or enteral nutrition should be initiated as early as possible—within the first 24–48 hours after hospital admission. The review addresses methods of intragastric and postpyloric nutrient administration, indications for percutaneous gastro- or jejunostomy placement, and also presents current perspectives on the necessity of additional administration of pharmaconutrients and probiotics. In addition, an algorithm for prescribing nutritional support in acute pancreatitis is provided. Accumulated evidence confirms that early oral or enteral nutrition is an essential component of intensive care for patients with acute pancreatitis.



Case reports
Effectiveness of multimodal medical rehabilitation program in a patient with esophageal cancer, severe metabolic disturbances, and functional deficiency: A case report
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), patients with esophageal cancer may develop severe functional impairments that render radical surgical intervention impossible. We present a clinical case of severe functional deficiency that developed in a patient with esophageal cancer during NACT, necessitating comprehensive medical rehabilitation prior to radical surgical intervention.
Case description: A 75-year-old male was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, stage cT3N0M0 (stage II). He received four cycles of antitumor therapy using the FLOT regimen (fluorouracil, calcium folinate, oxaliplatin, docetaxel), with a positive response. Radical surgical treatment was indicated; however, severe functional decline combined with metabolic disturbances precluded the procedure. A multimodal medical rehabilitation program, including therapeutic exercise, limb massage, nutritional support, and correction of metabolic and fluid-electrolyte imbalances, enabled clinical stabilization of patient within a short period.
CONCLUSION: Given the multifaceted nature of functional impairments in patients with esophageal cancer, medical rehabilitation should be based on multimodal programs incorporating symptomatic drug therapy. This approach appears to be optimal in this patient cohort.


