Том 15, № 1 (2022)
Articles
Constitutional Spiritual and Moral Values of Russia: Reflections on the Text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation
Аннотация
Customary Legal Relations of Mordvins and Chuvash
Аннотация
German Political and Legal Thought of the XIX - the First Half of the XX Centuries: General and Specific
Аннотация
Problems and Prospects for the Use of Information and Communication Technologies in the Activities of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
Аннотация
Activities of illegal financial market participants: financial and legal aspects and problems
Аннотация
Some Aspects of Improving Measures of Administrative and Legal Prevention and Coercion for Misuse of Funds Allocated for the Maintenance of Children
Аннотация
Tourist Region (Destination) as an Integral Element of Civil Law Relations in the Tourism System
Аннотация
On the Issue of the Bank's Civil Liability
Аннотация
Promising Directions in the Activities of the Penal Enforcement System of the Russian Federation (New, Well-Forgotten Old...)
Аннотация
The Excess of the Perpetrator and Other Accomplices of the Crime: Gaps in Criminal Law Regulation and Prospects for Improvement
Аннотация
Problems of External Social Factors Determining the Personality of a Professional Criminal
Аннотация
Corruption as a Social Phenomenon that Generates Negative Trends in Society
Аннотация
The Object and Subject of the Crime Under Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: Problems of Theoretical and Law Enforcement Interpretation
Аннотация
The purpose of the study is to present an updated interpretation of the object and subject of the crime under Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, to determine the prospects for optimizing Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. On the basis of the study, the author proves that the direct object of the crime under Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, has a complex structure: the main object is public relations related to the attraction of funds from citizens for the shared construction of apartment buildings or other real estate; an optional additional object is the property interests of participants in shared construction. Article 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation does not recognize the funds of legal entities as the subject of a crime, although in accordance with Federal Law No. 214-FZ of December 30, 2004, legal entities are recognized as full participants in shared construction along with citizens (with individuals). Whitespace Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in terms of the impossibility of bringing to responsibility for illegally attracting funds from legal entities for shared construction entails diverse negative consequences: firstly, it leaves the rights and interests of legal entities in the field of shared construction without proper criminal law protection; secondly, it creates risks of illegal criminal prosecution of developers who unlawfully attract funds from the organization for shared construction. The article emphasizes that law enforcement filling the gaps in Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation through the application of criminal law by analogy (due to a more repressive rule on liability for fraud) is unacceptable. The contradiction between the public danger of the act in question and the construction of Art. 200.3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation requires legislative permission by expanding the subject of the corresponding crime.